首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control >Nominal vs real wage rigidities in New Keynesian models with hiring costs: A Bayesian evaluation
【24h】

Nominal vs real wage rigidities in New Keynesian models with hiring costs: A Bayesian evaluation

机译:新凯恩斯模型中具有雇用成本的名义刚性与实际工资刚性:贝叶斯评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The inclusion of labor market frictions in the new Keynesian DSGE model overcomes the main drawbacks of the baseline framework. In this paper we show that this extended model, by assuming real wage rigidities, does not replicate the correct wage dynamics and the negative conditional correlation between technology shocks and employment observed in the data, known as the "productivity-employment puzzle" . We show also that these empirical limitations can be overcome by replacing real wage rigidities with nominal wage rigidities, without sacrificing other appealing features of the model. We adopt a Bayesian perspective to estimate the dynamic properties of the model with real wage rigidities and compare them with those of the model with nominal wage rigidities. We show that the evidence favors this latter construction.
机译:在新的凯恩斯主义DSGE模型中包括劳动力市场摩擦,克服了基准框架的主要缺点。在本文中,我们表明,通过假设实际工资刚性,这种扩展模型不能复制正确的工资动态以及数据中观察到的技术冲击与就业之间的负条件相关性,称为“生产率-就业难题”。我们还表明,在不牺牲模型的其他吸引人的特征的情况下,可以通过用名义工资刚性代替实际工资刚性来克服这些经验限制。我们采用贝叶斯(Bayesian)观点来估计具有实际工资刚性的模型的动态特性,并将其与具有名义工资刚性的模型的动态特性进行比较。我们表明证据支持后一种构造。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号