• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic Psychology >Sex differences in trust and trustworthiness: A meta-analysis of the trust game and the gift-exchange game
【24h】

Sex differences in trust and trustworthiness: A meta-analysis of the trust game and the gift-exchange game

机译：信任和可信度的性别差异：信托游戏和礼品交换游戏的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

We present a meta-analytic review of the literature on sex differences in the trust game (174 effect sizes) and the related gift-exchange game (35 effect sizes). Based on parental investment theory and social role theory we expected men to be more trusting and women to be more trustworthy. Indeed, men were more trusting in the trust game (g = 0.22), yet we found no significant sex difference in trust in the gift-exchange game (g = 0.15). Regarding trustworthiness, we found no significant sex difference in the trust game (g = -0.04), and we found men, not women, to be more trustworthy in the gift-exchange game (g = 0.33). These results suggest that men send more money than women do when their money is going to be multiplied, thereby creating an efficiency gain. This so-called "male multiplier effect" may be explained by a stronger psychological tendency in men to acquire resources.
机译：我们在信托游戏（174次效果大小）和相关礼品差异（35效尺寸）中提出了对性别差异的荟萃分析综述。基于父母投资理论和社会角色理论，我们预计男性将更加信任，女性更值得信赖。事实上，男人在信任游戏中更信任（G = 0.22），但我们发现在礼品交换游戏中没有明显的性别差异（G = 0.15）。关于可信度，我们发现信任游戏中没有显着的性别差异（G = -0.04），我们发现男性，而不是女性，在礼品交换游戏中更值得信赖（G = 0.33）。这些结果表明，当他们的金钱将增加时，男性会比女性送多少钱，从而创造效率增益。这种所谓的“男性乘法效应”可以通过男性的更强烈的心理倾向来解释，以获得资源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号