• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of educational technology systems >AVOIDING LITIGATION FOR PRODUCT INSTRUCTIONS AND WARNINGS
【24h】

AVOIDING LITIGATION FOR PRODUCT INSTRUCTIONS AND WARNINGS

机译：避免对产品说明和警告提起诉讼

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The plaintiff suing for injuries arising from a product with allegedly defective instructions or warnings has the burden of proving each of the elements for every cause of action asserted, while the defendant prevails by defeating just one element for each cause of action. Technical communicators can increase their legal literacy by learning the elements that are most easily defeated and thereby avoid subjecting their product instructions and warnings to litigation. This article surveys the existing scholarship to show the need for more attention to legal terms, theory, and practice before explaining how lawyers approach litigation. The article then turns to each of the main causes of action-the functional approach of the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability, negligence, and breach of express warranty and misrepresentation-with an emphasis upon the elements that are most within the control of the technical communicator.
机译：原告提起因产品声称带有错误指示或警告而造成的伤害，其举证责任是要针对所主张的每种诉讼因由证明每一要素，而被告胜诉是针对每种诉讼因由击败一项要素而胜诉。技术交流者可以通过学习最容易克服的要素来提高其法律素养，从而避免对其产品说明和警告进行诉讼。本文对现有奖学金进行了调查，以说明在解释律师如何处理诉讼之前需要更多关注法律术语，理论和实践。然后，文章探讨了每个导致诉讼的主要原因-侵权行为重述（第三项）的功能方法：产品责任，过失以及对明示担保和虚假陈述的违反-重点是控制范围内最重要的要素技术交流者。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of educational technology systems》 |2014年第4期|401-421|共21页
  • 作者

    JEFF TODD;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Finance and Economics Texas State University 601 University Drive San Marcos, TX 78666;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号