首页> 外文期刊>The journal of environmental education >Of big hegemonies and little tigers: Ecocentrism and environmental justice
【24h】

Of big hegemonies and little tigers: Ecocentrism and environmental justice

机译:大霸权和小老虎:生态中心主义和环境正义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Stefan Bengtsson's commentary about policy hegemony discusses the alternative discourses of socialism, nationalism, and globalism. However, Stefan does not adequately demonstrate how these discourses can overcome the Dominant Western Worldview (DWW), which is imbued with anthropocentrism. It will be argued here that most policy choices promoting sustainability, and education for it, are made within a predetermined system in which the already limiting notion of environmental protection is highly contingent on human welfare. What would really contest the dominant assumptions of Vietnamese policy and, more specifically, education for sustainable development (ESD) is an alternative discourse that challenges the DWW. That alternative discourse embraces philosophical ecocentrism and practices of ecological justice between all species, and deep ecology theory - all perspectives fundamentally committed to environmental protection.
机译:斯特凡·本格森(Stefan Bengtsson)关于政策霸权的评论论述了社会主义,民族主义和全球化的另类话语。但是,斯特凡没有充分说明这些话语如何克服充满人类中心主义的西方世界观(DWW)。这里将争论的是,大多数促进可持续性的政策选择以及对可持续性的教育是在预定的系统内做出的,在该系统中,已经很有限的环境保护概念在很大程度上取决于人类的福利。真正与越南政策,尤其是可持续发展教育(ESD)的主流假设相抵触的是对DWW提出挑战的另一种说法。这种替代性话语涵盖了所有物种之间的哲学生态中心主义和生态正义实践,以及深层生态学理论-所有观点都从根本上致力于环境保护。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号