• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of environmental education >Evaluation, or Just Data Collection? An Exploration of the Evaluation Practice of Selected UK Environmental Educators
【24h】

Evaluation, or Just Data Collection? An Exploration of the Evaluation Practice of Selected UK Environmental Educators

机译：评估还是仅收集数据？英国部分环境教育者评估实践的探索

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Little is known about the evaluation practices of environmental educators. Questionnaires and discussion groups with a convenience sample of UK-based practitioners were used to uncover their evaluation methods. Although many report that they are evaluating regularly, this is mainly monitoring numbers of participants or an assessment of enjoyment. There may be a difference between practitioners' and evaluation experts' understandings of what constitutes evaluation, with many practitioners appearing to see "data collection" and "evaluation" as synonymous. In addition, evaluators would not consider many of the methods used for data collection appropriate. More robust methods for collecting data and longer-term evaluations are often impractical for environmental educators to conduct themselves, and mechanisms are suggested for improving interaction between practitioners, researchers, and evaluators, which could enhance evaluation practice.
机译：关于环境教育者的评估实践知之甚少。通过问卷调查和讨论小组，以及来自英国的从业人员的便利样本，来发现他们的评估方法。尽管许多人报告说他们正在定期评估，但这主要是监视参与者的数量或对娱乐的评估。从业者和评估专家对构成评估的理解可能有所不同，许多从业者似乎将“数据收集”和“评估”视为同义词。此外，评估人员不会认为许多用于数据收集的方法是适当的。对于环境教育者来说，更健壮的数据收集方法和长期评估通常是不切实际的，并且提出了改善从业者，研究人员和评估者之间互动的机制，这可以增强评估实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号