The Use of Technology by Nonformal Environmental Educators

Tamara Elizabeth Peffer; Alec M. Bodzin; Judith Duffield Smith

首页> 外文期刊>The journal of environmental education >The Use of Technology by Nonformal Environmental Educators

【24h】

The Use of Technology by Nonformal Environmental Educators

机译：非正规环境教育者对技术的使用

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

This study examined the use of instructional and learning technologies by nonformal environmental educators. A 40-question survey was developed to inquire about practitioner demographics, technology use in practice, and beliefs about technology. The survey consisted of multiple choice, open-ended questions, and a Likert-type scale component-the Technology Attitudes, Perception, and Support Scale (TAPS) (Cronbach's a = 0.809). TAPS examined philosophies about technology use, self-efficacy, and perceived obstacles to technology integration within environmental education contexts. Findings revealed a philosophical acceptance and willingness to use technology in environmental education instruction; however, few integrate learning technologies into their instructional venues to enhance cognition and learning and there was concern that technology might have negative consequences on student connection to the natural environment. No single factor appears to influence environmental educator decisions to incorporate technology into non-formal settings.

机译：这项研究检查了非正规环境教育者对教学技术的使用。进行了40个问题的调查，以询问从业人员的人口统计资料，实践中使用的技术以及对技术的信念。该调查包括多项选择题，不限成员名额的问题和一个李克特式量表组件-技术态度，知觉和支持量表（TAPS）（Cronbach's = 0.809）。 TAPS考察了有关技术使用，自我效能以及在环境教育环境中技术集成的感知障碍的哲学。调查结果揭示了在环境教育教学中使用技术的哲学接受和意愿；但是，很少有将学习技术集成到他们的教学场所中以增强认知和学习的能力，并且有人担心技术可能会对学生与自然环境的联系产生负面影响。似乎没有任何一个因素会影响环境教育者将技术纳入非正规环境的决定。

著录项

来源
《The journal of environmental education》 |2013年第1期|16-37|共22页
作者
Tamara Elizabeth Peffer; Alec M. Bodzin; Judith Duffield Smith;
展开▼
作者单位

Learning Sciences and Technology PhD Program, College of Education, Lehigh University, 111 Research Drive, Iacocca Hall, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA;

Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA;

American International School, Cairo, Egypt;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词
environmental education; learning technologies; nonformal environmental education; technology; technology attitudes;

机译：环境教育;学习技术;非正规环境教育;技术;技术态度;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Environmental identity formation in nonformal environmental education programs [J] . Williams Corrie Colvin, Chawla Louise Environmental Education Research . 2016,第7期

机译：非正规环境教育计划中的环境身份形成
2. How do Wisconsin environmental educators perceive a potential, professional certification for individual environmental educators? [J] . Laurie Gharis, Rebecca L. Franzen, Kendra Liddicoat, Applied Environmental Education and Communication . 2020,第1期

机译：威斯康星州环境教育工作者如何看待个别环境教育工作者的潜在专业认证？
3. Environmental Balance Management In Nonformal Education Learning [J] . Abdul Rahmat, Tulus Suryanto, Supli Effendi Rahim MATEC Web of Conferences . 2018,第3期

机译：非正规教育学习中的环境平衡管理
4. Environmental education and the health risk question: how do we educate the educators working with this theme? [C] . D. M. Bianchini Bonotto International Conference on the Impact of Environmental Factors on Health; 20070627-29; Malta(MT) . 2007

机译：环境教育和健康风险问题：我们如何教育以这一主题工作的教育者？
5. Activists as teachers: A case study of nonformal educators and their roles in a social action organization. [D] . Davis, Lee. 1991

机译：活动家作为教师：非正规教育者及其在社会行动组织中的角色的案例研究。
6. The relevance of formal and nonformal primary education in relation to health well-being and environmental awareness: Bangladeshi pupils’ perspectives in the rural contexts [O] . M. Mahruf C. Shohel, Andrew J. Howes 2018

机译：正式和非正式的初等教育与健康福祉和环境意识的相关性：孟加拉国学生在农村环境中的观点
7. Competing Recombinant Technologies for Environmental Innovation: Extending Arthur’s Model of Lock-in Abstract: This article presents a model of sequential decisions about investments in environmentally dirty and clean technologies, which extends the path-dependence framework of Arthur (1989). This allows us to evaluate if and how an economy locked into a dirty technology can be unlocked and move towards the clean technology. The main extension involves the inclusion of the effect of recombinant innovation of the two technologies. A mechanism of endogenous competition is described involving a positive externality of increasing returns to investment which are counterbalanced by recombinant innovation. We determine conditions under which lock-in can be avoided or escaped. A second extension is â€œsymmetry breakingâ€ of the system due to the introduction of an environmental policy that charges a price for polluting. A final extension adds a cost of environmental policy in the form of lower returns on investment implemented through a growth-depressing factor. We compare cumulative pollution under different scenarios, so that we can evaluate the combination of environmental regulation and recombinant innovation. [O] . Van den Bergh J.C.J.M., Zeppini Rossi P. 100

机译：用于环境创新的竞争重组技术：扩展亚瑟的锁定模型摘要：本文介绍了关于环境污染和清洁技术投资的连续决策模型，该模型扩展了亚瑟（1989）的路径依赖框架。这使我们能够评估是否以及如何解锁陷入肮脏技术的经济并转向清洁技术。主要的扩展涉及包括两种技术的重组创新的效果。内生竞争的机制被描述为涉及通过重组创新抵消的增加投资回报的正外部性。我们确定可以避免或转义锁定的条件。由于引入了污染价格的环境政策，第二个延伸是系统的“对称性破坏”。最后的延期增加了环境政策的成本，通过增长抑制因素实现了较低的投资回报。我们比较了不同情景下的累积污染，从而可以评估环境调控与重组创新的结合。

The Use of Technology by Nonformal Environmental Educators

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅