• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of environmental law >Vagueness and Discretion in the Scope of the EIA Directive
【24h】

Vagueness and Discretion in the Scope of the EIA Directive

机译：EIA指令范围内的模糊性和自由裁量权

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Article 2(1), the core obligation imposed by the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive, requires that projects 'likely to have a significant effect on the environment' are subject to an environmental assessment. The vague term 'significant effect' confers a broad discretion in interpreting the scope of the Directive, which the European Commission has identified as problematic. This article examines the role of this discretion in the regulatory framework, in order to contribute to a better understanding of the nature and purpose of Environmental Impact Assessment. The analysis is conducted through the lens of Endicott's theory on 'vagueness' in law, which helps to understand the nature of Article 2(1) discretion. It demonstrates that discretion is integral to the framework rather than a side effect of the formulation of Article 2(1) and that it is valuable because it creates space to consider a vast array of factors in the assessment of 'significance' and promotes deliberation on environmental values.
机译：第2（1）条是《环境影响评估指令》规定的核心义务，要求“可能对环境产生重大影响”的项目必须接受环境评估。含糊的“重大影响”一词赋予了解释欧盟指令范围的广泛酌处权，欧盟委员会认为该指令存在问题。本文研究了这种自由裁量权在监管框架中的作用，以便有助于更好地理解环境影响评估的性质和目的。分析是通过恩迪科特的法律“模糊性”理论进行的，这有助于理解第2条第1款的自由裁量权的性质。它表明，自由裁量权是框架不可或缺的，而不是第2条第（1）款所产生的副作用，它是有价值的，因为它创造了空间，可在“重要性”评估中考虑各种因素，并促进对环境价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号