...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Design principles and common pool resource management: An institutional approach to evaluating community management in semi-arid Tanzania
【24h】

Design principles and common pool resource management: An institutional approach to evaluating community management in semi-arid Tanzania

机译：设计原则和公共资源库管理：评估半干旱坦桑尼亚社区管理的一种体制方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper analyses the role of institutions in the management of common pool resources (CPRs) in semi-arid Tanzania. Common property regimes have often been considered inadequate for the management of CPRs because of the problems of excludability, but they are becoming more widely supported as the way forward to overcome the problems of resource use and degradation in developing countries. A series of design principles for long enduring common property institutions have been proposed by Ostrom, but there is concern that they are not applicable to a wide range of real life situations or that they may be specific to certain types of CPR. Here, we compare these principles to the situation prevailing in 12 villages in six districts in semi-arid Tanzania. Data on management institutions were collected through semi-structured interviews and meetings at district and village level. The combined information was used to make a qualitative assessment of the strength with which each design principle appeared to operate in the management of forest, pasture and water resources. Boundaries, conflict and negotiation in CPR management are of key importance in semi-arid regions. However, the need for flexibility in order to deal with ecological uncertainty means that many management institutions would be considered weak or absent according to the design principle approach. This supports the view that the design principles should not be used as a 'blueprint to be imposed on resource management regimes' rather that they provide a framework for investigating common property regimes with the proviso that, certainly for semi-arid regions, they may highlight where management cannot be explained by institutional theory alone.
机译：本文分析了半干旱坦桑尼亚机构在公共资源池（CPR）管理中的作用。由于存在排他性的问题，人们普遍认为公共财产制度不足以管理CPR，但作为克服发展中国家资源使用和退化问题的途径，公共财产制度得到了越来越广泛的支持。 Ostrom提出了用于长期使用的共同财产机构的一系列设计原则，但令人关注的是它们不适用于各种现实生活情况，或者可能特定于某些类型的CPR。在这里，我们将这些原则与半干旱坦桑尼亚六个地区的12个村庄的普遍情况进行了比较。有关管理机构的数据是通过在地区和乡村进行的半结构化访谈和会议收集的。结合使用的信息对每种设计原则在森林，牧场和水资源管理中发挥作用的强度进行定性评估。心肺复苏术管理中的边界，冲突和谈判在半干旱地区至关重要。但是，为应对生态不确定性而需要灵活性意味着根据设计原则方法，许多管理机构将被视为薄弱或不存在。这支持这样一种观点，即设计原则不应用作“施加于资源管理制度的蓝图”，而应为调查共同财产制度提供一个框架，但条件是，对于半干旱地区，它们当然可以强调不能仅凭制度理论来解释管理的地方。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号