首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Analysis of local perspectives on sustainable forest management: an Indonesian case studyThis study was funded through a collaborative project between the University of Illinois and the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). The ideas co
【24h】

Analysis of local perspectives on sustainable forest management: an Indonesian case studyThis study was funded through a collaborative project between the University of Illinois and the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). The ideas co

机译:分析当地关于可持续森林管理的观点:印度尼西亚的案例研究该研究由伊利诺伊大学和国际林业研究中心(CIFOR)合作开展。创意公司

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite widespread acceptance of sustainability as the ultimate goal of forest management, perspectives about its meaning, significance, and relevant indicators may still differ. This paper examines local perspectives on sustainability, and evaluates their similarities and differences. A systematic procedure based on criteria of proximity, pre-existing rights, dependency, knowledge of forest management, forestry spirit, daily activity, and legal rights was used to identify a small group of relevant stakeholders representing different groups, institutions, and organizations. Using participatory action research (PAR), stakeholders were asked to identify relevant indicators of sustainable forest management. The indicators identified by each stakeholder were then compared to a consolidated list assembled by field facilitators with respect to whether relevant indicators are present or not. Based on the resulting presence/absence matrix, a statistical tool called the simple matching coefficient was used to estimate the similarity measures among the stakeholders' perspectives. In addition, cluster analysis was used to classify groups of stakeholders depending on their similarities to each other. Finally, hypotheses related to the 'closeness' of perspectives among local communities, non-governmental organizations, a timber company, and government organizations, as revealed by their selection of indicators, were tested. Results show that: (a) local communities have different perceptions in terms of what they consider to be important indicators compared to the NGOs, (b) there are significantly different perceptions between the government and the timber companies, and (c) there are also different perceptions between urban and field-based personnel of the same organization.
机译:尽管人们广泛接受可持续性作为森林管理的最终目标,但关于其含义,重要性和相关指标的观点仍可能不同。本文考察了当地关于可持续性的观点,并评估了它们的异同。基于亲近性,既有权利,依赖性,森林管理知识,林业精神,日常活动和合法权利的标准的系统程序被用来识别代表不同团体,机构和组织的一小部分相关利益相关者。使用参与式行动研究(PAR),要求利益相关者确定可持续森林管理的相关指标。然后,将每个利益相关者确定的指标与由现场主持人汇总的综合列表进行比较,以确定是否存在相关指标。根据所得的存在/不存在矩阵,使用一种称为简单匹配系数的统计工具来估计利益相关者观点之间的相似性度量。另外,使用聚类分析根据利益相关者之间的相似性对利益相关者进行分类。最后,检验了与通过选择指标揭示的地方社区,非政府组织,木材公司和政府组织之间的观点“亲密性”有关的假设。结果表明:(a)与非政府组织相比,当地社区对重要指标的看法不同;(b)政府与木材公司之间的看法明显不同;(c)同一组织的城市人员与现场人员之间的看法不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号