• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of experimental and theoretical artificial intelligence (Online) >Which symbol grounding problem should we try to solve?
【24h】

Which symbol grounding problem should we try to solve?

机译：我们应该尝试解决哪个符号接地问题？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Floridi and Taddeo propose a condition of 'zero semantic commitment' for solutions to the grounding problem, and a solution to it. I argue briefly that their condition cannot be fulfilled, not even by their own solution. After a look at Luc Steel's very different competing suggestion, I suggest that we need to re-think what the problem is and what role the 'goals' in a system play in formulating the problem. On the basis of a proper (syntactic) understanding of computing, I come to the conclusion that the only sensible grounding problem is how we can explain and re-produce the behavioural ability and function of meaning in artificial computational agents.
机译：弗洛里迪（Floridi）和塔迪奥（Taddeo）提出了解决基础问题的“零语义承诺”条件和解决方案。我简要地指出，他们的条件无法实现，甚至无法通过他们自己的解决方案来实现。在看了Luc Steel截然不同的竞争建议之后，我建议我们需要重新考虑问题是什么，以及系统中“目标”在解决问题中所起的作用。在对计算有正确的（句法）理解的基础上，我得出的结论是，唯一明智的基础问题是我们如何能够解释和再现人工计算代理中意义的行为能力和功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号