• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Financial Regulation & Compliance >Systemic surcharges and measures of systemic importance
【24h】

Systemic surcharges and measures of systemic importance

机译：系统附加费和具有系统重要性的措施

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose – There is an emerging consensus that systemically important banks should face stricter regulations and systemic surcharges. To make this latter principle operational the regulator will need to quantify the systemic importance of individual banks. The purpose of this paper is to review the proposed measures of systemic importance from the research community and discuss their merits relative to how a regulator would ideally wish to calibrate surcharges on systemically important banks, and to evaluate how useful proposed measures of the systemic importance of financial institutions will be to regulators. Design/methodology/approach – The author reviews the main contributions to the research literature and discusses their relevance for the problem faced by regulators. Findings – There are five main caveats that make the proposed measures of systemic importance less useful for regulators. Practical implications – The proposed measures may help identify relevant aspects of systemic importance, but the regulators will need to construct their own measures for practical use. Originality/value – The paper provides a critical review of a research literature that could potentially have large practical implications.
机译：目的–对于具有系统重要性的银行，人们应达成越来越严格的法规和系统附加费的共识。为了使后一个原则可行，监管机构将需要量化单个银行的系统重要性。本文的目的是回顾研究界提出的具有系统重要性的拟议措施，并讨论其相对于监管机构理想地希望校准具有系统重要性的银行的附加费的优点，并评估拟议的具有系统重要性的措施的有用程度。金融机构将向监管机构。设计/方法/方法-作者回顾了对研究文献的主要贡献，并讨论了它们与监管机构面临的问题的相关性。调查结果–有五个主要警告，这些建议使具有系统重要性的拟议措施对监管机构的作用降低。实际意义–拟议的措施可能有助于确定系统重要性的相关方面，但监管机构将需要构建自己的措施以供实际使用。原创性/价值–该论文对研究文献进行了严格的评论，该研究文献可能具有很大的实际意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号