• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance >Extent to which financial services compensation scheme can pursue claims assigned to it by investors whom it has compensated
【24h】

Extent to which financial services compensation scheme can pursue claims assigned to it by investors whom it has compensated

机译：金融服务赔偿计划可以追究赔偿的投资者转让给它的程度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose – The paper's aim is to report and comment on two preliminary issues that arose from claims being pursued by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) against Abbey National Treasury Services (ANTS) and NDF Administration Ltd (NDF). Design/methodology/approach – The paper outlines the facts and explains the decision. Findings – The FSCS commenced action against ANTS as assignee of the assigned claims and alleged that ANTS had collaborated with NDF in product development and promotion of the Structured Capital at Risk Products and was liable in negligence and misrepresentation to the investors whose claims it held as assignee. Having considered the arguments, the Judge concluded that FSA did have power to make rules enabling FSCS to take assignment of investor claims. Originality/value – The issues in this case go to the heart of the funding mechanism of the FSCS. The financing of such compensation schemes is a perennially controversial issue in every jurisdiction that has them.
机译：目的–本文的目的是就金融服务赔偿计划（FSCS）对修道院国家财政部（ANTS）和NDF管理有限公司（NDF）提出的索赔提出的两个初步问题进行报告和评论。设计/方法/方法-本文概述了事实并解释了决定。调查结果– FSCS开始作为被转让债权的受让人对ANTS提起诉讼，并声称ANTS与NDF合作开发了产品，并推广了风险产品的结构化资本，并对作为其债权人的投资者有过失和虚假陈述的责任。 。在考虑了这些论点之后，法官得出结论认为，FSA确实有权制定规则，使FSCS能够转让投资者债权。原创性/价值–在这种情况下，问题成为FSCS筹资机制的核心。在具有补偿计划的每个司法管辖区中，此类补偿计划的融资问题一直是一个长期存在争议的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号