• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Health Services Research & Policy >Interdisciplinarity in health services research: dreams and nightmares, maladies and remedies
【24h】

Interdisciplinarity in health services research: dreams and nightmares, maladies and remedies

机译：卫生服务研究的跨学科性：梦想与噩梦，疾病和补救措施

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Interdisciplinarity has become popular in health services research. Advocates suggest that interdisciplinarynapproaches may produce more accessible, applicable, exciting and realistic knowledge than traditional disciplinarynapproaches. To date, there has been surprisingly little analysis of the institutional and intellectual demands ofninterdisciplinarity as a methodology or practice. This paper (1) identifies some basic intellectual and institutionalnfeatures of interdisciplinary research, (2) describes typical interdisciplinary ‘dreams’ and correspondingn‘nightmares’ that researchers might encounter in practice, (3) highlights maladies of interdisciplinary researchncareers and suggests practical remedies, and (4) discusses implications for health research policy. Individualnresearchers can avoid pitfalls of interdisciplinarity through strategies that include selective collaboration, crosstraining,nsustained relationships, good humour, participation in peer review, declaring the place of one’s work, andnbalancing dissemination of research between peer and other audiences. Interdisciplinary activities span institutionalnboundaries and make novel demands on academic resources and allegiances. Research organizations can improventheir hospitality to interdisciplinary work by encouraging straightforward communication, recognising interdisciplinarynproductivity, making allowances for the higher time and energy costs of interdisciplinary liaisons, andnproviding the necessary institutional support and stability to cultivate projects to fruition. Alongside the creation ofnlarge new interdisciplinary networks and organizations, we should invest in the highly valuable contributions of smallnand enduring interdisciplinary teams, modest interdisciplinary stretches and evolving interdisciplinary creatures.
机译：跨学科在卫生服务研究中已变得流行。倡导者认为，跨学科的方法比传统的学科的方法可能会产生更多的可访问性，适用性，令人兴奋和现实的知识。迄今为止，令人惊讶的是，很少有人对作为方法论或实践的非学科性的制度和思想要求进行分析。本文（1）指出了跨学科研究的一些基本知识和制度特征;（2）描述了研究人员在实践中可能遇到的典型跨学科``梦''和相应的``噩梦'';（3）突出了跨学科研究职业的弊端并提出了实用的补救措施;以及（4）讨论对健康研究政策的影响。个体研究人员可以通过以下策略来避免跨学科的陷阱：选择性协作，交叉培训，保持良好的关系，保持良好的幽默感，参加同行评审，宣布工作地点以及平衡研究在同行与其他受众之间的传播。跨学科活动跨越机构边界，对学术资源和忠诚提出了新的要求。研究组织可以通过鼓励直接沟通，认识跨学科生产力，允许跨学科联络人花费更多的时间和能源成本，提供必要的机构支持和稳定性来培养项目以实现成果，从而提高对跨学科工作的热情。除了建立大型的新跨学科网络和组织外，我们还应该投资于规模持久的跨学科团队，适度的跨学科范围和不断发展的跨学科生物的宝贵贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号