首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Health Services Research & Policy >Health services research in Australia: an investigation of its current status
【24h】

Health services research in Australia: an investigation of its current status

机译:澳大利亚的卫生服务研究:对其现状的调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: The objectives of this audit were to document the current status of health services research (HSR) in Australia in terms of inputs and outputs. Inputs were defined as the number of organised centres or groups undertaking HSR, the extent to which HSR was being developed and the funding available for HSR. Outputs were measured as the number of peer-reviewed papers. nnMethods: Centres or groups were identified via the membership of the HSRAANZ and a web-based search. Information from annual reports and/or other published sources was used to determine the extent of capacity building and available funding. The tables of contents of 21 journals published over a 10-year period were searched for articles reporting Australian HSR. nnResults: Eighteen groups were identified that undertook HSR as their predominant activity, while twelve were involved in HSR as a collaborative activity. No HSR-specific training (in terms of under- or postgraduate degrees) was identified, although more than 400 postgraduate students were being supervised in the university departments where HSR groups were situated. Between 1998 and 2001, more than AU$13 million was awarded for HSR, most of it by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). Over the past 10 years, 482 articles about Australian health services have been published in the peer-reviewed journals audited. nnConclusions: Although HSR is widespread in Australia, no specific training appears to be available to build capacity. Overall, HSR is not well-funded especially by organisations outside the NHMRC or Australian Research Council. Thus, it is not surprising that the output of Australian HSR, in terms of peer-reviewed articles, is slight.
机译:目标:这次审核的目的是根据投入和产出来记录澳大利亚卫生服务研究(HSR)的当前状况。投入定义为开展高铁的组织中心或团体的数量,高铁的开发程度以及可用于高铁的资金。以同行评审论文的数量衡量产出。 nnMethods:通过HSRAANZ的成员身份和基于Web的搜索来识别中心或组。来自年度报告和/或其他公开来源的信息被用于确定能力建设和可用资金的程度。搜索在十年内出版的21种期刊的目录,以查找报告澳大利亚高铁的文章。结果:确定了18个将HSR作为主要活动的小组,而12个小组将HSR作为协作活动参加了。尽管有400多名研究生在HSR小组所在的大学系中接受了督导,但没有发现针对HSR的专门培训(根据学士学位或研究生学位)。在1998年至2001年之间,为HSR颁发了超过AU 1300万美元,其中大部分是由美国国家卫生与医学研究委员会(NHMRC)颁发的。在过去的十年中,在经过同行评审的期刊上发表了482篇有关澳大利亚卫生服务的文章。结论:尽管高铁在澳大利亚很普遍,但似乎没有专门的培训来提高能力。总体而言,高铁的资金不足,尤其是NHMRC或澳大利亚研究委员会以外的组织。因此,就同行评审的文章而言,澳大利亚高铁的产出微不足道也就不足为奇了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号