• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Health Services Research & Policy >Measuring the impact of health research
【24h】

Measuring the impact of health research

机译：衡量健康研究的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Measuring the decision-making impact of applied health research should constitute a core function for many research funders and research organizations. Different target audiences warrant different measures of impact. The target audiences for applied health research include the general public, patients (and their families), clinicians, managers (in hospitals, regional health authorities and health plans), research and development officers (in biotechnology firms) and public policy-makers (i.e. elected officials, political staff and civil servants). Making meaningful assessments within peer groups that fund or produce similar types of research knowledge for similar types of target audiences makes more sense than a one-size-fits-all approach to impact assessment. User-pull and interactive measures of impact (i.e. measures of cultural shifts that would facilitate the on-going use of research knowledge to inform decision-making) can supplement more traditional producer-push measures that assess researchers' active efforts to inform decision-making and the outcome of these efforts. Cultural shifts may include the creation of a research-attuned culture among decision-makers and a decision-relevant culture among researchers. Moving beyond whether research was used to examine how it was used is also important. Research knowledge may be used in instrumental, conceptual or symbolic ways. These actions, coupled with on-going refinements to the proposed assessment tool as research evidence evolves, would take us a long way towards assessment and accountability in the health sector.
机译：衡量应用健康研究的决策影响应构成许多研究资助者和研究组织的核心职能。不同的目标受众需要不同的影响力度量。应用健康研究的目标受众包括公众，患者（及其家人），临床医生，管理人员（在医院，区域卫生当局和健康计划中），研发人员（在生物技术公司中）和公共政策制定者（即当选官员，政治人员和公务员）。在同等群体中进行有意义的评估，以为相似类型的目标受众提供资金或产生相似类型的研究知识，这比一种千篇一律的影响评估方法更有意义。用户对影响的拉动和互动衡量（即有助于不断使用研究知识来为决策提供依据的文化变迁的衡量手段）可以补充评估研究人员为决策做出积极努力的传统生产者推动措施以及这些努力的结果。文化上的转变可能包括在决策者之间建立一种与研究相适应的文化，在研究人员之间建立与决策相关的文化。超越是否使用研究来检查其使用方式也很重要。研究知识可以工具性，概念性或象征性方式使用。这些行动，以及随着研究证据的发展对拟议评估工具的不断完善，将使我们在卫生部门进行评估和问责制方面走很长的路。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Health Services Research & Policy》 |2003年第3期|p.165-170|共6页
  • 作者

    Measuring the impact of health research;

  • 作者单位

    Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis;

    Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics;

    Department of Political Science, McMaster University, and Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;

    Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, and Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada;

    Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, and Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;

    Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis;

    Department of Political Science, and Health Studies Programme, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    health research; impact;

    机译：健康研究;影响;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号