• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of housing and the built environment >Immigrants and home in the making: thresholds of domesticity, commonality and publicness
【24h】

Immigrants and home in the making: thresholds of domesticity, commonality and publicness

机译：移民和房屋建造：家庭性，公共性和公共性的门槛

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The search for home as a material and symbolic space is an increasingly salient social question across contemporary multiethnic cities. The boundaries between what is public, communal and domestic are increasingly contested and yet remain a crucial issue, especially for minority groups such as immigrant and ethnic communities. The domestication of everyday living spaces carried out by immigrant and ethnic groups entails a variety of ways of 'cultivating home'. In a context characterized by transnational mobility, ethnic segregation and social marginality, domesticity-understood as the potential to enact a domestic dimension in meaningful places-is an important asset to resist present hardships, cultivate memory and lay out projects for the future. In this Editorial, we seek to untangle the multiple stakes entailed by the practices of 'making home' and 'feeling at home'. We invite scholars to observe how, even in minute and mundane details, dwelling places and the built environment come to be imbued with social and cultural meanings, which are pivotal to survival and social recognition. The articulation of domesticity, commonality and publicness can be fruitfully mapped through the concept of 'thresholds', which brings together the case studies that follow. By doing so, this Special Issue as a whole lays out a new research agenda at the intersection of housing, urban and migration studies.
机译：在当代多民族城市中，寻找家园作为物质和象征性空间是一个日益突出的社会问题。公共，公共和家庭之间的界限日益受到争议，但仍然是至关重要的问题，特别是对于诸如移民和族裔社区这样的少数群体而言。移民和族裔群体对日常生活空间的驯化需要多种“修养之家”的方式。在跨国流动，族裔隔离和社会边缘化为特征的背景下，被理解为在有意义的地方建立家庭规模的潜力的家庭是抵御当前的困难，培养记忆力并为未来制定计划的重要资产。在本社论中，我们力求消除“在家”和“在家中感觉”的做法所带来的多重风险。我们邀请学者观察，即使在微小而平凡的细节中，居住场所和建筑环境也如何充满社会和文化意义，而这对于生存和社会认可至关重要。可以通过“阈值”的概念对家庭，共同性和公共性进行清晰的描述，从而将随后的案例研究结合在一起。这样，本期《特刊》将在住房，城市和移民研究的交叉领域提出新的研究议程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号