• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Human Development and Capabilities >Adaptive Preferences and Procedural Autonomy
【24h】

Adaptive Preferences and Procedural Autonomy

机译：适应性偏好和程序自治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Capabilities theorists hold that adaptive preference (APs) are problematically shaped by deprivation, and that they thus merit public interrogation. However, it is unclear what differentiates APs from preferences worthy of public respect. Thinking of APs as procedurally non-autonomous promises grounds on which to distinguish them without compromising respect for moral pluralism. Using examples from gender and development practice, I argue that — despite the appeal of this route — there are deep problems with thinking of APs as non-autonomous. Conceptions of APs as non-autonomous do not identify APs in a way consistent with our intuitions and fail to provide appropriate practical guidance to public institutions interested in interrogating APs. I suggest in the conclusion that identifying APs requires a theory of the good.
机译：能力理论家认为，适应性偏好（AP）受到剥夺问题的影响，因此值得公众质疑。然而，目前尚不清楚什么使AP与值得公众尊重的偏好区分开。将AP视为程序上非自治的做法，为在不损害对道德多元性的尊重的前提下区分它们提供了依据。通过性别和发展实践的例子，我认为，尽管这条路线很有吸引力，但将AP视为非自治仍然存在深层问题。 AP的非自治概念不会以我们的直觉来识别AP，也无法为有兴趣询问AP的公共机构提供适当的实践指导。我在结论中建议，确定受影响人需要一种善良的理论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号