• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of institutional economics >Social and scientific disorder as epistemic phenomena, or the consequences of government dietary guidelines
【24h】

Social and scientific disorder as epistemic phenomena, or the consequences of government dietary guidelines

机译：作为认知现象的社会和科学疾病，或政府饮食指南的后果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

We begin with a process-oriented model of science according to which signals concerning scientific reputation serve both to coordinate the plans of individuals in the scientific domain and to ensure that the knowledge that emerges from interactions between scientists and the environment is reliable. Under normal circumstances, scientific order emerges from the publication-citation-reputation (PCR) process of science. We adopt and extend F. A. Hayek's epistemology according to which knowledge affords successful plan-based action and we employ this in the development of an epistemic theory of social order. We propose that external interferences with the PCR process have distorting effects on scientific knowledge and, thus, on scientific and social order more broadly. We support this claim by describing the history of the US federal government's development of standardized dietary guidelines for American consumers and its concomitant interference in the PCR process of nutritional science. We conclude that this interference contributed to social disorder in dietary science and beyond.
机译：我们从面向过程的科学模型开始，根据该模型，有关科学声誉的信号既可用于协调科学领域中个人的计划，又可确保从科学家与环境之间的相互作用中获得的知识是可靠的。在正常情况下，科学秩序是由科学的出版物-引文-声誉（PCR）过程产生的。我们采用并扩展了F. A.哈耶克的认识论，根据该认识论，知识可以提供成功的基于计划的行动，并将其应用于社会秩序的认识论理论的发展中。我们认为，PCR过程的外部干扰会对科学知识产生扭曲的影响，从而对科学和社会秩序产生更广泛的影响。我们通过描述美国联邦政府为美国消费者制定的标准化饮食指南的历史及其伴随的对营养科学PCR过程的干预，来支持这一主张。我们得出的结论是，这种干扰导致饮食科学及其他方面的社会混乱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号