...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of institutional economics >Economics for a creative world: some agreements and some criticism
【24h】

Economics for a creative world: some agreements and some criticism

机译:创造世界的经济学:一些协议和一些批评

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

These notes on the article by Koppl et al. (2014) contain some agreements and some criticism. Written upon the invitation of the editor-in-chief of this journal, they express personal views of an economist who has been searching in a similar direction - that is, for a better economic theory, more relevant to problems of modern, innovative, and thus possibly called 'creative' economies than the existing theories - but in a somewhat different, less abstract, and to standard economic terminology closer style. The strongest agreements are with both parts of the article's objective: to move away from mechanistic economic models and toward a more evolutionary and institutional approach to economic theory and policy. The pursuit of the first part is most seriously criticized for two illegitimate extensions of initially sound arguments, and the pursuit of the second part, for climbing up to a too abstract metatheoretic level, from which it loses the view of the concrete results that modern economics has already obtained.
机译:这些关于Koppl等人的文章的注释。 (2014)包含一些协议和一些批评。应本杂志主编的邀请,他们表达了对经济学家的个人看法,他们一直在朝着相似的方向努力,即寻求更好的经济理论,以解决与现代,创新和经济问题更为相关的问题。因此,与现有的理论相比,它可能被称为“创造型”经济-但以稍微不同,不太抽象的方式出现,并且与标准的经济术语更接近。最强烈的共识与本文的目标都息息相关:摆脱机械经济模型,转向对经济理论和政策采取更具进化性和制度性的方法。对第一部分的追求受到最严厉的批评,原因是最初合理论证的两个非法扩展,而对第二部分的追求则攀升到过于抽象的元理论水平,从中它失去了对现代经济学具体结果的看法。已经获得。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of institutional economics》 |2015年第1期|47-53|共7页
  • 作者

    PAVEL PELIKAN;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Institutional Economics, University of Economics, Prague, Czech Republic;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号