...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of institutional economics >Judicial creativity and judicial errors: an organizational perspective
【24h】

Judicial creativity and judicial errors: an organizational perspective

机译：司法创造力和司法错误：组织视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The different role played by case law and the historical and conceptual differences between the doctrines of precedent in common law and civil law traditions are important determinants of judicial creativity. In this article, we consider a hybrid version of stare decisis, called by the French name of jurisprudence constante, adopted by mixed jurisdictions. Unlike stare decisis, which allows a single precedent to establish case law, the doctrine of jurisprudence constante links the recognition of a judge-made rule to the existence of a consecutive line of decisions affirming the same legal principle. We develop a model to consider the effects of this doctrine on the social costs arising from judicial error and uncertainty in case law. We further consider the effects of these alternative doctrines of precedent on judicial creativity and ideological bias in judge-made law.
机译：判例法的不同作用以及普通法和民法传统中先例学说之间的历史和概念差异是司法创造力的重要决定因素。在本文中，我们考虑混合司法管辖区采用的凝视决策的混合版本，即法学常数的法语名称。与允许单一先例建立判例法的凝视决定法不同，常数法学说将对法官制定规则的承认与确认同一法律原则的连续判决的存在联系起来。我们建立了一个模型来考虑该理论对司法错误和判例法不确定性产生的社会成本的影响。我们进一步考虑了这些先例替代理论对法官创造法律中司法创造力和意识形态偏见的影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of institutional economics》 |2010年第1期|91-98|共8页
  • 作者

    BARBARA LUPPI; FRANCESCO PARISI;

  • 作者单位

    University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Department of Economics and Center for Economic Research, Italy;

    Law School, University of Minnesota, USA and Department of Economics, University of Bologna, Spain;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号