...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of internet law >CALIFORNIA PAPARAZZI ACTIVITIES UNDER THE FIRST AMENDMENT: THE LEGAL LIMITS TO THEIR DAY-TO-DAY ACTIVITIES
【24h】

CALIFORNIA PAPARAZZI ACTIVITIES UNDER THE FIRST AMENDMENT: THE LEGAL LIMITS TO THEIR DAY-TO-DAY ACTIVITIES

机译：根据第一修正案进行的加州PAPARAZZI活动：其日常活动的法律限制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Protecting an individual's privacy is certainly a laudable goal. We should not be constantly harassed and followed by unwanted press attention. Yet, in California the problem of protecting individual privacy is compounded by a celebrity industry that thrives off public exposure. Determining the line between how the paparazzi are legally entitled to carry out its profession versus the privacy rights of celebrities is complex. Any person, including a celebrity, is certainly entitled to privacy for their spouses, children, and other family members on private property during private family moments. Yet, when the same group of individuals is in public at a family activity, where do paparazzi free press rights begin and end? Celebrities are public figures and do give up some of their privacy rights simply for remaining in the public eye. As discussed in this article, the press, including paparazzi, has a First Amendment right to pursue their photos and videos. Federal jurisprudence protects this right.
机译：保护个人隐私当然是值得称赞的目标。我们不应该经常受到骚扰，而引起媒体的不必要关注。然而，在加利福尼亚州，保护名人隐私的问题又因繁盛的公众娱乐活动而变得更加复杂。确定狗仔队在法律上有权享有其职业与名人的隐私权之间的界限很复杂。任何人，包括名人在内，在私人家庭聚会期间，当然都有权为其私人财产中的配偶，子女和其他家庭成员提供隐私。然而，当同一群人在家庭活动中公开露面时，狗仔队的自由出版权在哪里开始和结束？名人是公众人物，只是为了保留公众视野而放弃了一些隐私权。正如本文所讨论的，包括狗仔队在内的新闻界都拥有《第一修正案》的权利来追求他们的照片和视频。联邦判例保护这项权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of internet law》 |2016年第4期|3-8|共6页
  • 作者

    Joshua Azriel;

  • 作者单位

    Kennesaw State University;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号