...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of internet law >THE FUTURE OF INTERNET-RELATED PERSONAL JURISDICTION AFTER GOODYEAR DUNLAP J.MCINTYRE V.NIGASTRO
【24h】

THE FUTURE OF INTERNET-RELATED PERSONAL JURISDICTION AFTER GOODYEAR DUNLAP J.MCINTYRE V.NIGASTRO

机译：DUNLAP J.MCINTYRE V.NIGASTRO进犯后的互联网相关个人管辖权的未来

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Since the World Wide Web was introduced in the early 1990s, it has infiltrated so many aspects of our personal and professional lives. We use the Internet to communicate, conduct business, shop, socialize, entertain ourselves, and gather information. In many ways, the Internet has made our lives easier and better. Yet by facilitating and increasing contact with the rest of the world, the Internet potentially expands the doctrine of personal jurisdiction and exposes individuals and corporations to suit in distant and inconvenient locations. For the past two decades, courts have struggled with the question of how Internet-related contacts should be treated in the personal jurisdiction analysis. Some courts have utilized the traditional minimum contacts framework of International Shoe v. Washington,1 while others have devised new tests to accommodate this technological evolution.~2 So when the US Supreme Court granted certiorari in two personal jurisdiction cases last term—Goodyear Dunlap Tires v. Brown~3 and J. Mclntyre v. Nicastro~4— many believed these unsettled questions of Internet-related personal jurisdiction would finally be resolved. Disappointingly for litigants, lower courts, and academics, however, Goodyear and Mclntyre give little guidance about the future of personal jurisdiction in our virtual world.
机译：自1990年代初期引入万维网以来，它已经渗透到我们个人和职业生活的许多方面。我们使用Internet进行交流，开展业务，购物，社交，娱乐自己并收集信息。互联网在许多方面使我们的生活更加轻松和美好。但是，通过促进和增加与世界其他地方的联系，Internet可能扩展了个人管辖权的学说，并使个人和公司适应于遥远和不便的地方。在过去的二十年中，法院一直在努力解决在个人管辖权分析中应如何处理与互联网相关的联系这一问题。一些法院利用了国际鞋业诉华盛顿案的传统最低限度接触框架，1而另一些法院则设计了新的测试方法来适应这种技术发展。〜2因此，当美国最高法院上届在两个人事管辖权案件中批准了certiorari时，即Goodyear Dunlap Tires v。Brown〜3和J. Mclntyre诉Nicastro〜4案-许多人认为这些与互联网相关的个人管辖权尚未解决的问题将最终得到解决。对于诉讼人，下级法院和学者而言，令人失望的是，固特异和麦金太尔对于虚拟世界中未来个人管辖权的指导很少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号