• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of internet law >VALUING INTERNET COMPANIES: ORDER V. CHAOS
【24h】

VALUING INTERNET COMPANIES: ORDER V. CHAOS

机译：评估互联网公司：订单V.混沌

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Anyone who followed the price dive of Internet stocks knows that the market has given little comfort or consistency in the value of Internet companies over the last two and one-half years. In fact, it took only a year to turn the Wall Street's giddy enthusiasm for Internet companies into laments of gloom and doom. During the Internet stock bubble, new metrics had been suggested to explain the stratospheric market capitalization of unprofitable dotcoms. Investors were advised to look at revenues, registered users, traffic, strategic positioning, first-in-category, proprietary technology, brand, affiliations, and comparison to other Internet companies. However, equally qualified experts at the time bluntly asserted that popular metrics such as eyeballs, click-throughs, and revenues were just plain wrong.
机译：任何跟随互联网股票价格跳水的人都知道，在过去两年半的时间里，市场对互联网公司的价值几乎没有安慰或保持一致。实际上，仅用了一年时间，华尔街对互联网公司的狂躁热情就变成了悲观与悲惨的哀叹。在互联网泡沫期间，有人提出了新的指标来解释无利可图的网络公司的平凡的市值。建议投资者注意收入，注册用户，流量，战略定位，同类第一，专有技术，品牌，隶属关系以及与其他互联网公司的比较。但是，当时合格的专家直言不讳地指出，流行的指标（如眼球，点击率和收入）完全是错误的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号