首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Management Inquiry >Why Meta-Organizations Matter: A Response to Lawton et al. and Spillman
【24h】

Why Meta-Organizations Matter: A Response to Lawton et al. and Spillman

机译:为什么元组织很重要:对Lawton等的回应。和Spillman

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In a recent issue in this journal, Lawton et al. and Spillman argue for the importance of studying trade associations, also referred to with the broader term meta-organization. They discuss why meta-organizations matter and why more research is needed on the topic. We fully concur with the authors that meta-organizations constitute an inflating, diverse, and undeniable phenomenon of collective action among organizations and that collective scholarly efforts are necessary to improve our understanding of meta-organizations in their multiplicity. In this article, we shed some light on a body of work already investigating the matter. They constitute what we call the European School of meta-organization. We show the relevance of this recent European work for the US-UK-oriented trade association research and aim to bridge the gap between these research traditions by proposing a common research agenda on key topics of resources, forms' differentiation, coopetition, and their role in sustainability governance.
机译:在该期刊的最新一期中,Lawton等人。 Spillman和Spillman认为研究贸易协会的重要性,也称为广义组织。他们讨论了为什么元组织如此重要,以及为什么需要对该主题进行更多的研究。我们完全同意作者的观点,即元组织构成了组织间集体行动的一种膨胀,多样化和不可否认的现象,集体学术努力对于增进我们对元组织多样性的理解是必要的。在本文中,我们阐明了一些已经在调查此事的工作。它们构成了我们所谓的欧洲元组织学派。我们展示了这项最新的欧洲工作与以美国-英国为导向的贸易协会研究的相关性,旨在通过就资源,形式的差异,合作以及其作用等关键主题提出共同的研究议程,弥合这些研究传统之间的鸿沟在可持续性治理中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号