• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Management Inquiry >Organizational Responses to Proto- Institutions: How the Semi-edited and Unedited Accounts Clash
【24h】

Organizational Responses to Proto- Institutions: How the Semi-edited and Unedited Accounts Clash

机译：组织对原始机构的反应：半编辑和未编辑帐户如何发生冲突

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

While adoption of institutionalized structures has received immense attention from organizational scholars, the processes associated with adoption of proto-institutions are infrequently studied. Drawing on an ethnographic longitudinal study of Producer Choice adoption by a public broadcasting organization, I contribute to the extant literature by offering three findings. First, I show how the semi-edited account of an initial implementation of proto-institution clashes with multiple unedited accounts of subsequent adoptions and results in increased ambiguity regarding the structure. Second, I shed light on how actors involved in the focal adoption struggled to follow incompatible accounts and gauge the proto-institution's value. Last, I show how actors produce their own adoption by borrowing the justification for reform from the semi-edited account but founding its design on a previous adoption that was perceived as failed.
机译：尽管采用制度化结构已引起组织学者的广泛关注，但很少研究与采用原始机构相关的过程。通过对公共广播组织采用“生产者选择”的民族志纵向研究，我通过提供三个发现为现存文献做出了贡献。首先，我展示了原始机构最初实施的半编辑说明与后续采用的多个未编辑说明之间的冲突以及如何在结构上增加了歧义。其次，我阐明了参与焦点采用的参与者如何努力遵循不相容的说法并评估原型机构的价值。最后，我展示了参与者如何通过从半编辑帐户中借用改革的理由，但根据先前被认为是失败的采用来建立其设计，从而产生自己的采用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号