• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Management Inquiry >Finding Theory-Method Fit: A Comparison of Three Qualitative Approaches to Theory Building
【24h】

Finding Theory-Method Fit: A Comparison of Three Qualitative Approaches to Theory Building

机译：寻找理论方法的契合度：三种定性理论构建方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article, together with a companion video, provides a synthesized summary of a Showcase Symposium held at the 2016 Academy of Management Annual Meeting in which prominent scholarsDenny Gioia, Kathy Eisenhardt, Ann Langley, and Kevin Corleydiscussed different approaches to theory building with qualitative research. Our goal for the symposium was to increase management scholars' sensitivity to the importance of theory-method fit in qualitative research. We have integrated the panelists' prepared remarks and interactive discussion into three sections: an introduction by each scholar, who articulates her or his own approach to qualitative research; their personal reflections on the similarities and differences between approaches to qualitative research; and answers to general questions posed by the audience during the symposium. We conclude by summarizing insights gleaned from the symposium about important distinctions among these three qualitative research approaches and their appropriate usages.
机译：本文以及随附的视频提供了在2016年管理学院年会上举行的展示座谈会的综合摘要，其中知名学者丹尼·吉奥亚，凯西·艾森哈特，安·兰利和凯文·科利通过定性研究讨论了不同的理论构建方法。本次研讨会的目的是提高管理学者对定性研究中理论方法拟合重要性的敏感性。我们将小组成员的准备发言和互动讨论分为三个部分：每位学者的引言，阐明了自己的定性研究方法；他们对定性研究方法之间的异同的个人思考；以及在座谈会上观众提出的一般性问题的答案。最后，我们总结了研讨会上收集到的关于这三种定性研究方法之间的重要区别及其适当用法的见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号