• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of military ethics >CASE STUDY COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS: RULES, CONSEQUENCES, VIRTUES, AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
【24h】

CASE STUDY COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS: RULES, CONSEQUENCES, VIRTUES, AND ENGINEERING ETHICS

机译：案例研究评论和分析：规则，后果，美德和工程伦理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

As a US military engineer might say, BLUF (bottom line up front): Major Andrews proceeds conscientiously and reasonably given his position in the coalition chain of command. The important issue here is not the delta in actual dollars the LQNAs request versus those they have earned by the letter of their contract with AED; that delta is insignificant compared with the vast sums pouring into a country rife with corruption and the potentially catastrophic ripples if infrastructure projects fail for lack of adequate oversight in the field. What matters most is mission accomplishment: getting the projects completed well and as close to on time as possible. A prerequisite is high-quality LQNA oversight and reporting. In order to ensure that, Major Andrews needs to keep good LQNAs on the job, motivated to do their best. That could mean upping their paltry wage or finding some other incentive. To that end, Major Andrews might explore possibilities with contract experts. If he finds no short-term means of increasing incentives, he could rethink the maximum number of hours he would allow LQNAs to count. That is not to say he should endorse falsified reports, but rather that absent definite knowledge he might credit the possible rather than just the probable. (Compare mainstream business ethics on deception as a foul but a cosmopolitan perspective as reasonable.) Apparently, Major Andrews does not take these steps. That arguable peccadillo aside, he acts well. But why should he consider seeking ways to increase the LQNAs' effective hourly wage?
机译：就像美国军事工程师可能会说的那样：BLUF（最下面的一行）：安德鲁斯少校认真勤奋地前进，并考虑到他在联合指挥系统中的位置。这里的重要问题不是LQNA要求的实际美元与他们与AED的合同书所赚取的美元之间的差额。与大量资金涌入一个充满腐败的乡村和如果基础设施项目因缺乏足够的监督而失败的潜在灾难性涟漪相比，这一差额是微不足道的。最重要的是任务的完成：使项目顺利完成并尽可能按时完成。前提是高质量的LQNA监督和报告。为了确保这一点，安德鲁斯少校需要保持良好的LQNA，并努力做到最好。那可能意味着提高他们微不足道的工资或寻找其他诱因。为此，安德鲁斯少校可能会与合同专家一起探讨各种可能性。如果他没有找到增加激励措施的短期手段，那么他可以重新考虑允许LQNA计算的最大小时数。这并不是说他应该认可伪造的报告，而是要说他缺乏确切的知识，他会相信可能性，而不仅仅是可能性。 （比较主流商业道德时将欺骗视为犯规，但将国际视野视为合理）。显然，安德鲁斯少校没有采取这些步骤。除了可争论的佩奇卡迪洛之外，他的表现还不错。但是，为什么他应该考虑寻求提高LQNA的有效小时工资的方法？

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of military ethics》 |2014年第4期|384-385|共2页
  • 作者

    James L. Cook;

  • 作者单位

    United States Air Force Academy, Colorado, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号