首页> 外文期刊>Journal of military ethics >WARFARE ETHICS IN SUNZI'S ART OF WAR? HISTORICAL CONTROVERSIES AND CONTEMPORARY PERSPECTIVES
【24h】

WARFARE ETHICS IN SUNZI'S ART OF WAR? HISTORICAL CONTROVERSIES AND CONTEMPORARY PERSPECTIVES

机译:孙子兵法中的战争伦理?历史争议和当代观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Contemporary English and Chinese scholars alike have interpreted Sunzi's Art of War as advocating amoralism in warfare. That charge has a long history in pre-modern China and has not been fully refuted. This essay argues that the alleged amoral Machiavellianism is more appropriate for ancient Qin military thought than for Sunzi. The third chapter of Sunzi's treatise contains a distinctive moral perspective that cannot be found in the military thought of the state of Qin, which succeeded in defeating all other states in the Period of the Warring States. Such a moral perspective contains both ad bellum and in bello norms. I submit that my interpretation of Sunzi's warfare ethics can provide an important resource for the People's Liberation Army of China to construct full-scale just war ethics that is similar to Western understandings.
机译:中英两国当代学者都将孙子的《孙子兵法》视为提倡战争中的非道德主义。该指控在前现代中国历史悠久,尚未得到完全驳斥。本文认为,所谓的不道德的马基雅维利派主义比古代的孙子更适合古秦军事思想。 《孙子论》的第三章包含了独特的道德观点,这在秦国的军事思想中是找不到的。秦国在战国时期成功击败了所有其他国家。这样的道德观点既包含了拥护态度,也包含了良好的规范。我认为,我对孙子战争伦理的理解可以为中国人民解放军建立类似于西方的全面战争伦理提供重要资源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号