• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Operational Risk >Outsourcing risk: a separate operational risk category?
【24h】

Outsourcing risk: a separate operational risk category?

机译：外包风险：单独的运营风险类别？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Financial authorities and supervisors have emphasized concerns about outsourcing risk for about a decade. A recent European Banking Authority consultation paper discusses "outsourcing" as a subtopic within "operational risk arising from outsourced services and activities, and whether these can affect the institution's ability to process transactions". However, it remains open whether there is an additional operational risk if one compares internal and external sourcing, qualifying "outsourcing" as a separate risk category. Starting from the perspective of the boundary of a firm (ie, the boundary between internal and external production), this paper identifies three steps in sourcing. First, there is business risk, linked to the ex ante entrepreneurial decision to "make or buy", with the required due diligence to make the "best" selection with regard to the allocation of resources. Second, all sourcing has intrinsic risk, although this is independent of the selection of internal production or external sourcing, ie, the boundary of the firm. Third, multisourcing generates a new type of risk, which emerges from the complexity of the sourcing ecosystem at either provider or firm level.
机译：大约十年来，金融机构和监管机构一直强调对外包风险的担忧。欧洲银行管理局最近的一份咨询文件将“外包”作为“由外包服务和活动引起的运营风险，以及这些是否会影响该机构处理交易的能力”的一个子主题进行讨论。但是，如果将内部和外部采购进行比较，将“外包”定为一个单独的风险类别，则是否还有其他操作风险仍未解决。从企业边界（即内部和外部生产之间的边界）的角度出发，本文确定了采购的三个步骤。首先，存在与事前做出“制造或购买”企业家决定相关的商业风险，需要尽职调查以做出关于资源分配的“最佳”选择。其次，所有采购都具有内在风险，尽管这与内部生产或外部采购（即公司的边界）的选择无关。第三，多供应源产生了一种新型的风险，这种风险源于供应商或公司一级的采购生态系统的复杂性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号