...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Planning & Environment Law >Greyfort Properties Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Torbay Council
【24h】

Greyfort Properties Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Torbay Council

机译:Greyfort Properties Ltd诉社区和地方政府大臣和Torbay委员会

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

None of the arguments advanced before this court has come near to persuading me that the inspector fell into legal error in concluding as he did that the planning permission was not lawfully implemented. Condition 4 was a clear, express prohibition on the commencement of any work on the site before the ground floor levels of the building had been agreed. The inspector was entitled to find that those ground floor levels were fundamental to the development permitted and that the condition went to the heart of the permission. The access works were carried out in breach of the condition. They fell squarely within the Whitley principle, on the basis of which they could not constitute a lawful implementation of the planning permission. None of the recognised exceptions to the Whitley principle applies. There is nothing in the reasoning of Sullivan J. in Hart Aggregates to suggest that the principle should not be applied in circumstances such as these. Application of the principle does not produce absurd results or tend to frustrate the underlying purpose or policy of the legislation. On the contrary, the conclusion reached through application of the principle strikes me as an entirely sensible one on the facts.
机译:在本法院面前没有提出的任何论点都无法说服我说,检查专员在得出结论时陷入了法律错误,因为他确实认为规划许可没有得到合法执行。条件4明确明确禁止在商定建筑物底层之前在现场进行任何工作。检查员有权发现这些底层对于允许的开发是至关重要的,并且条件是允许的核心。进出工程违反了条件。它们完全属于Whitley原则,在此基础上,它们不能构成对规划许可的合法实施。惠特利原则的公认例外均不适用。 Sullivan J.在《 Hart Aggregates》中的推理中没有任何内容表明该原则不应在这种情况下应用。原则的适用不会产生荒谬的结果,也不会破坏立法的根本目的或政策。相反,通过应用该原则得出的结论使我在事实上感到完全明智。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号