• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events >Revitalization and counter-revitalization: tourism, heritage, and the Lantern Festival as catalysts for regeneration in Hi An, Vit Nam
【24h】

Revitalization and counter-revitalization: tourism, heritage, and the Lantern Festival as catalysts for regeneration in Hi An, Vit Nam

机译：振兴与反振兴：旅游，遗产和元宵节是越南南部安安市再生的催化剂

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

When employed for development purposes, tourism often elicits a fundamental tension between locals' desire (and need) to both change and to stay the same. Like other development projects, it is often paradoxically conceived as a means of empowering and 'bettering' hosts that necessarily rests in the hands of the guests. After briefly tracing the historical conjunctures between development discourses and tourism, the author argues for the adoption of an alternative theory, one that eschews development's tautologies and evolutionary notions: Anthony Wallace's classic revitalization theory, a 'deliberate, organized, conscious effort by members of a society to construct a more satisfying culture'. He contends that this paradigm is a more totalizing set of processes, since it accounts for environmental, religious, psychological, and biological pressures stemming from extra-cultural challenges. Using ethnographic fieldwork to explore the emergence of Hi An from a sleepy Vietnamese town into the country's most popular destination, the author shows that, while the impetus for the adoption of tourism may have been the intervention of outsiders, locals perceiving a variety of pressures on their way of life truly shaped the manner in which the town regenerated itself. In particular, they respond to the tension between transformation and tradition by implementing a monthly Lantern Festival that ritually refreshes their sense of communitas and reinforces the unique temporality in which they live. More importantly, it urges both practitioners and theorists to consider the productivity of adopting a revitalization paradigm to better understand and implement urban regeneration projects that focus on tourism and festivals.
机译：当旅游业用于发展目的时，通常会在当地人改变和保持不变的愿望（和需求）之间引起根本性的矛盾。像其他开发项目一样，它常常被自相矛盾地认为是一种赋权和“改善”房东的手段，而这些手段必然落在客人的手中。在简短地追溯了发展话语和旅游业之间的历史联系之后，作者主张采用另一种理论，该理论避免了发展的重言式和进化论：安东尼·华莱士的经典振兴理论，即“有组织，有意识，有组织地成员的有意识的努力”。社会来构建更令人满意的文化”。他认为，这种范式是一套更全面的过程，因为它解决了因文化外的挑战而产生的环境，宗教，心理和生物压力。作者利用人种学的田野调查来探索从困倦的越南小镇到越南最受欢迎的目的地的西安市的兴起，作者表明，虽然采用旅游业的动力可能是外来者的干预，但当地人却感受到了各种各样的压力。他们的生活方式真正塑造了小镇自我更新的方式。尤其是，他们通过实施每月的元宵节来应对转型与传统之间的紧张关系，该节仪式在仪式上刷新了他们的社区意识，并增强了他们所居住的独特时空。更重要的是，它敦促从业者和理论家都考虑采用振兴范式的生产力，以更好地理解和实施以旅游业和节日为重点的城市更新项目。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号