...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Postcolonial Writing >Trauma theory and postcolonial literary studies
【24h】

Trauma theory and postcolonial literary studies

机译：创伤理论与后殖民文学研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The plurality and growing number of responses to cultural trauma theory in postcolonial criticism demonstrate the ongoing appeal of trauma theory despite the fact that it is also increasingly critiqued as inadequate to the research agenda of postcolonial studies. In the dialogue between trauma theory and postcolonial literary studies the central question remains whether trauma theory can be effectively “postcolonialized” in the sense of being usefully conjoined with postcolonial theory. This article presents a detailed account of the core concepts and tenets of cultural trauma theory in order to contribute to a clearer understanding of the issues currently at stake in this developing relationship between trauma theory and postcolonial literary studies. It engages with fundamental issues, such as those deriving from trauma theory’s foundation in Freudian psychoanalysis; its Eurocentric orientation; its inherent contradictions, such as its deconstructionist aesthetics of aporia vs notions of therapeutic and recuperative narrativization; and its tendency to blur lines of distinction and to affirm stasis and melancholia as the empathic, responsible reception of trauma narratives. This article argues for a more precise, as well as more comprehensive, conceptualization of trauma and formulates possible directions in which to expand trauma’s conceptual framework, in order to respond more adequately to postcolonial ways of understanding history, memory and trauma.View full textDownload full textKeywordstrauma, postcolonialism, memory, Eurocentrism, literary criticismRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17449855.2011.569378
机译：后殖民批评中对文化创伤理论的回应越来越多，这表明创伤理论仍具有吸引力，尽管事实也越来越多地批评它不适合后殖民研究的议程。在创伤理论与后殖民文学研究之间的对话中，中心问题仍然是，创伤理论是否可以有效地与后殖民理论结合起来，才能被有效地“后殖民化”。本文详细介绍了文化创伤理论的核心概念和宗旨，以有助于更清晰地了解当前在创伤理论与后殖民文学研究之间这种发展的关系中所涉及的问题。它涉及一些基本问题，例如那些源自弗洛伊德心理分析中创伤理论基础的问题；其以欧洲为中心的方向；它的内在矛盾，例如其对阿弗里亚症的解构主义美学与治疗性和康复性叙事的概念；并倾向于模糊区分界线，并肯定瘀血和忧郁症是对创伤性叙述的同情和负责任的接受。本文主张对创伤进行更精确，更全面的概念化，并为扩大创伤的概念框架制定可能的方向，以便更充分地应对理解历史，记忆和创伤的后殖民方式。全文全文下载关键字词义，后殖民主义，记忆，欧洲中心主义，文学批评相关的变量add add_id “，pubid：” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17449855.2011.569378

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号