...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of power sources >Support schemes and ownership structures - the policy context for fuel cell based micro-combined heat and power
【24h】

Support schemes and ownership structures - the policy context for fuel cell based micro-combined heat and power

机译：支持计划和所有权结构-基于燃料电池的热电联产的政策环境

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In recent years, fuel cell based micro-combined heat and power (mCHP) has received increasing attention due to its potential contribution to European energy policy goals, i.e., sustainability, competitiveness and security of supply. Besides technical advances, regulatory framework and ownership structures are of crucial importance in order to achieve greater diffusion of the technology in residential applications. This paper analyses the interplay of policy and ownership structures for the future deployment of mCHP. Furthermore, it regards the three country cases Denmark, France and Portugal. Firstly, the implications of different kinds of support schemes on investment risk and the diffusion of a technology are explained conceptually. Secondly, ownership arrangements are addressed. Then, a cross-country comparison on present support schemes for mCHP and competing technologies discusses the national implementation of European legislation in Denmark, France and Portugal. Finally, resulting implications for ownership arrangements on the choice of support scheme are explained. From a conceptual point of view, investment support, feed-in tariffs and price premiums are the most appropriate schemes for fuel cell mCHP. This can be used for improved analysis of operational strategies. The interaction of this plethora of elements necessitates careful balancing from a private- and socio-economic point of view.
机译：近年来，基于燃料电池的微热电联产（mCHP）由于其对欧洲能源政策目标（即可持续性，竞争力和供应安全）的潜在贡献而受到越来越多的关注。除了技术进步外，监管框架和所有权结构对于在住宅应用中实现该技术的更大普及至关重要。本文分析了未来mCHP部署的政策和所有权结构之间的相互作用。此外，它涉及丹麦，法国和葡萄牙这三个国家案例。首先，从概念上解释了各种支持方案对投资风险和技术扩散的影响。其次，解决所有权安排问题。然后，对当前的mCHP和竞争技术支持计划进行跨国比较，讨论了丹麦，法国和葡萄牙在欧洲实施的国家立法。最后，解释了所有权安排对支持计划选择的影响。从概念上讲，投资支持，上网电价和价格溢价是燃料电池mCHP的最合适方案。这可用于改进操作策略分析。从私人和社会经济的角度来看，过多要素的相互作用需要进行仔细的平衡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号