...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of product innovation management >Perspective: State-of-the-Art: The Quality of Case Study Research in Innovation Management
【24h】

Perspective: State-of-the-Art: The Quality of Case Study Research in Innovation Management

机译：透视：最先进的：创新管理的案例研究质量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The practice of innovation management is developing fast. As new concepts emerge, exploratory studies are needed and case study research is often appropriate. To investigate the usage and quality of case study research in innovation management, all of the articles published in five top journals over 20 years (1997-2016) were reviewed. Case study research accounted for 818 of the published articles in this period (12%) and an evaluation template (termed case study evaluation template: CASET) was developed to objectively assess these articles against 10 quality criteria. It was found that the quality of case study research has often been low, although it has improved over time. Similarly, quality was found to fluctuate both within and between the different innovation journals. This indicates that the peer review process for case study research is not as robust as it should be. The assessment of individual articles using the evaluation template found significant deficiencies. Many articles: did not justify why case study research was appropriate; did not apply theoretical sampling criteria; were not transparent on how conclusions were drawn from the data; did not consider validity and reliability adequately; and did not go beyond description in their interpretation. However, the evaluation template also identified 23 "exemplary studies," which clearly addressed nearly every criterion. Such exemplary studies provide innovation management researchers with "benchmark" reading, which can help shape their own research. This article makes four contributions to the innovation management discipline. First, the evaluation template and exemplary studies can help innovation researchers improve the quality of their case study research. Second, clear recommendations are given for how reviewers can use the template to make the peer review process more consistent and robust. Third, journal editors are encouraged to consider the implications of the findings for their particular journal. Fourth, the article should stimulate a long overdue debate on methodology in innovation management research, including the use of case study research.
机译：创新管理的实践快速发展。随着新概念出现，需要探索性研究，案例研究往往是合适的。为调查创新管理的使用和质量研究，所有文章在20多年（1997-2016）中发表的五个最高期刊上发表的所有文章。案例研究研究占本期发表的文章的818（12％）和评估模板（被称为案例研究评估模板：Caset），以客观地评估这些文章以防止10个质量标准。结果发现，案例研究的质量往往很低，但随着时间的推移已经提高。同样，发现质量在不同的创新期刊之间和之间的水平波动。这表明案例研究研究的同行评审过程并不应尽可能强大。使用评估模板评估个体制品发现了显着的缺陷。许多文章：没有证明为什么案例研究研究是合适的;没有应用理论上的抽样标准;关于从数据中得出的结论并不透明;没有充分考虑有效性和可靠性;并没有超越他们的解释。然而，评估模板还确定了23个“示例性研究”，这几乎可以解决了几乎每个标准。此类示例性研究为“基准”阅读提供了创新管理研究人员，可以帮助塑造自己的研究。本文对创新管理学科进行了四项贡献。首先，评价模板和示例性研究可以帮助创新研究人员提高其案例研究的质量。其次，审阅者如何使用模板来使对等审查过程更加一致和强大的建议。第三，鼓励期刊编辑审议调查结果对其特定期刊的影响。第四，本文应刺激创新管理研究中的方法论延长辩论，包括使用案例研究研究。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The journal of product innovation management》 |2019年第5期|586-615|共30页
  • 作者

    Goffin Keith; Ahlstrom Par; Bianchi Mattia; Richtner Anders;

  • 作者单位

    Stockholm Sch Econ SSEs House Innovat Stockholm Sweden|Cranfield Sch Management Cranfield Beds England;

    Stockholm Sch Econ House Innovat Operat Management Stockholm Sweden;

    Stockholm Sch Econ House Innovat POB 6501 S-11383 Stockholm Sweden;

    Stockholm Sch Econ Execut Educ Stockholm Sweden;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号