• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Progressive Human Services >Advocacy, Politics and the Responsibilities of Professional Associations: The Curious Case of the Guest Editorial
【24h】

Advocacy, Politics and the Responsibilities of Professional Associations: The Curious Case of the Guest Editorial

机译：宣传，政治与专业协会的责任：客人的好奇案例社论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In the past, the leadership of the National Association of Social Workers (NASW) has taken positions on controversial political issues such as the invasion of Iraq, torture and the US Patriot Act. It was surprising, therefore, that it recently insisted that the names of leading neocon-servative intellectuals and officials be deleted from a guest editorial written for the journal Social Work on the ground that their inclusion could jeopardize the association's tax exempt status. The nature of the guest editorial and the apparent contradiction between the leadership's previous advocacy efforts and its refusal to include the names is discussed in this Soapbox. The need to clarify the advocacy responsibilities of professional organizations such as NASW is briefly considered.
机译：过去，全国社会工作者协会（NASW）的领导人在诸如伊拉克入侵，酷刑和《美国爱国者法案》等有争议的政治问题上担任过职务。因此，令人惊讶的是，它最近坚持要从为《社会工作》杂志撰写的客座社论中删除主要的新保守派知识分子和官员的姓名，理由是这些人的加入可能会损害该协会的免税地位。在此Soapbox中讨论了来宾社论的性质以及领导层先前的倡导工作与拒绝使用姓名之间的明显矛盾。简要考虑了需要澄清诸如NASW之类的专业组织的倡导职责的必要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号