【24h】

Policy overreaction

机译:政策过度反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The literature on policy success and failure does not capture policies that may be too successful, as well as "too much" and/or "too soon" patterns of policy. To bridge this gap, this conceptual article relies on one of the most robust findings in the psychology of judgement, namely that many people are overconfident, prone to place too much faith in their intuitions. Based on this premise, the analytical framework advanced here revolves around two key dimensions of policy overreaction: (i) the effects of positive and negative events, and (ii) the effects of overestimation and accurate estimation of information. Based on these dimensions, the article identifies and illustrates four distinct modes of policy overreaction that reflect differences in the nature of implemented policy. It argues that the policy tools menu utilised in each mode of policy overreaction is dominated by unique mechanisms for changing or coordinating behaviour, which, once established, produce excessive - objective and/or perceived - social costs.
机译:有关策略成功和失败的文献并未涵盖可能过于成功的策略以及“太多”和/或“太快”的策略模式。为了弥合这种差距,这篇概念文章依赖于判断心理学中最有力的发现之一,即许多人过分自信,倾向于对自己的直觉抱有过多的信念。在此前提下,此处提出的分析框架围绕政策过度反应的两个关键维度:(i)正面和负面事件的影响,以及(ii)高估和准确估算信息的影响。基于这些方面,本文确定并说明了四种不同的政策过度反应模式,这些模式反映了已实施政策的本质差异。它认为,在每种政策过度反应模式中使用的政策工具菜单都由独特的机制来控制,这些机制用于改变或协调行为,一旦建立,就会产生过多的客观和/或可感知的社会成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号