• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Public Policy >Can policy-packaging increase public support for costly policies? Insights from a choice experiment on policies against vehicle emissions
【24h】

Can policy-packaging increase public support for costly policies? Insights from a choice experiment on policies against vehicle emissions

机译：政策包装可以增加公众对昂贵政策的支持吗？从车辆排放政策的选择试验中的洞察

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Public support is usually a precondition for the adoption and successful implementation of costly policies. We argue that such support is easier to achieve with policy-packages that incorporate primary and ancillary measures. We specifically distinguish command-and-control and market-based measures as primary measures and argue that the former will usually garner more public support than the latter given the low-visibility tendency of costs associated with command-and-control measures. Nevertheless, if included in a policy-package, ancillary measures are likely to increase public support by reducing negative effects of primary measures. Based on a choice experiment with a representative sample of 2,034 Swiss citizens, we assessed these arguments with respect to political efforts to reduce vehicle emissions. The empirical analysis supported the argument that policy-packaging affects public support positively, particularly generating more support when ancillary measures are added. Lastly, we ultimately observe that command-and-control measures obtain more public support than market-based instruments.
机译：公共支持通常是通过和成功实施成本级政策的前提。我们认为，这种支持更容易实现合并初级和辅助措施的政策包。我们专门区分指挥控制和基于市场的措施作为主要措施，并争辩说，前者通常会在后者赋予与指挥控制措施相关的成本低的可见性趋势而比后者更加公众支持。然而，如果在策略包中包含，辅助措施可能会通过减少初级措施的负面影响来增加公众支持。根据选择实验，有2,034名瑞士公民的代表性样本，我们对减少车辆排放的政治努力评估了这些论点。实证分析支持策略包装积极影响公众支持的论点，特别是当添加辅助措施时产生更多支持。最后，我们最终观察到命令和控制措施比以市场为基础的仪器获得更多的公共支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号