...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management >An optimisation strategy for concurrent Supply Chain Finance schemes
【24h】

An optimisation strategy for concurrent Supply Chain Finance schemes

机译：并发供应链金融方案的优化策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The uncertainty and financial instability that has plagued companies and industries in the last decade is one of the root causes behind the development of Supply Chain Finance (SCF), a set of schemes aiming to optimise the management of financial flows at the supply chain level. Recent years have seen a proliferation of different SCF schemes, with different impacts on working capital costs and requirements throughout the supply chain. The practicality of SCF usage indicates that the concurrent adoption of multiple schemes is not only possible, but even likely. However, literature on SCF still focuses on individual SCF schemes, while the concurrent adoption of multiple SCF schemes remains largely unaddressed. Thus, the objective of this paper is to assess the tangible benefits deriving from a multi-scheme SCF strategy. Based on the analytical formulation of the benefits of three relevant SCF schemes (Reverse Factoring, Inventory Financing and Dynamic Discounting), the paper formalises a model that investigates the benefits that a buyer can achieve by onboarding suppliers onto these three schemes. The results show how working capital requirements and the cost of finance represent the key parameters to assessing the benefits of the concurrent adoption of multiple SCF schemes. Moreover, the funding limits of the SCF schemes themselves strongly affect the relevance of such strategies; strict limits will increase the relevance of having 'alternative' schemes available to onboard suppliers. To highlight the managerial relevance of the model, the article provides a numerical example based on a real-world application.
机译：在过去十年中困扰公司和行业的不确定性和财务不稳定是供应链金融（SCF）发展背后的根本原因之一，这是一组旨在优化供应链级别管理金融流量管理的计划。近年来，不同的SCF方案的扩散，对整个供应链的营运资金成本和要求产生不同的影响。 SCF使用的实用性表明，多种方案的并发采用不仅可能，但甚至可能是可能的。然而，SCF的文献仍然集中在个人SCF方案上，而多个SCF方案的并行采用仍然在很大程度上是未解决的。因此，本文的目的是评估从多种方案SCF策略得出的有形益处。基于三种相关SCF方案的益处的分析制定（反向对接，库存融资和动态折扣），该论文正规调整一个模型，调查买方可以通过砧板供应商实现这三个方案的益处。结果表明，营运资金需求和金融成本代表了评估多个SCF方案的同时采用益处的关键参数。此外，SCF方案的资金限制本身强烈影响了这种策略的相关性;严格的限制将增加具有船上供应商可用的“替代”计划的相关性。为了突出模型的管理相关性，文章提供了基于真实世界应用的数值示例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号