• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Religion and Health >Definitions and Evaluation of Religion and Spirituality Items by Religious Professionals: A Pilot Study
【24h】

Definitions and Evaluation of Religion and Spirituality Items by Religious Professionals: A Pilot Study

机译：宗教专业人员对宗教和精神项目的定义和评估：一项初步研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In an effort to clarify the concepts of religion and spirituality religious professionals (Imams, Ministers, Priests, and Rabbis) defined the terms religion and spirituality and responded to whether the concepts religion and spirituality were different (i.e. non-overlapping), the same, or overlapping. Additionally, they rated each item from the five measures (purportedly to assess religion or spirituality) for the extent to which the items assess the construct of religion and/or spirituality. Content analysis of definitions revealed religion as objective, external, and ritual or organizational practices that one performs in a group setting and that guide one’s behavior; while spirituality was defined as internal, subjective, and divine experience or direct relationship with God. Primarily the concepts were viewed as overlapping. Analysis for item ratings revealed few within group differences and relatively few between group differences for ratings of item relevance to assess religion and spirituality. Factor analysis of item ratings revealed one factor named religion/spirituality.
机译：为了阐明宗教和灵性的概念，宗教专业人士（伊玛目，部长，牧师和拉比斯）定义了宗教和灵性一词，并对宗教和灵性的概念是否不同（即不重叠），相同，或重叠。此外，他们从五项评估（据称是评估宗教或灵性）中对每个项目进行了评分，以评估这些项目评估宗教和/或灵性的建构的程度。对定义的内容分析表明，宗教是一种客观的，外在的，仪式性的或组织性的行为，可以在小组环境中进行并指导人们的行为；而灵性被定义为内部，主观和神圣的经历或与上帝的直接关系。最初，这些概念被认为是重叠的。对项目等级的分析显示，对于评估宗教和灵性的项目相关等级，组间差异很小，而组间差异相对很小。项目评级的因素分析显示了一个因素，即宗教/精神。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号