• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of risk research >The meaning of risk-taking - key concepts and dimensions
【24h】

The meaning of risk-taking - key concepts and dimensions

机译：风险接受的含义 - 关键概念和尺寸

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Dealing with and taking risks are central issues of current societies which had been characterised by heightened debates and conflicts about risk (Beck, Giddens). Even though there is good knowledge available, policies and strategies to reduce people's risk-taking are often less successful than expected. Experts are puzzled about common people not following good advice presuming people's lack of understanding. While this might be true in many cases a growing body of research shows, rather than being merely ignorant or misinformed, people often have good knowledge when taking risks. A growing body of research provides knowledge about the complexities, dynamics and contradictions of people's risk-taking. However, there have been little attempts to systematise this body of knowledge. This article contributes to such an enterprise. It suggests distinguishing between different motives for risk-taking, different levels of control and a number of ways how reflexivity about risk is rooted in the social realm. It also explores how risk-taking is part of developing and protecting a valued identity. The article concludes, across different domains there is good evidence for how structural and cultural forces combine and shape risk-taking while people take risks to develop a valued identity and to protect it. Advancing expert's understanding of risk-taking and change people's risk-taking require considering and approaching the larger social contexts and individual risk practices in everyday life.
机译：处理和承担风险是当前社会的核心问题，这些社会的特征在于辩论和风险冲突（Beck，Giddens）。尽管存在良好的知识，但降低人们风险的政策和策略通常比预期的成功往往不那么成功。专家对普通人不受追随人民缺乏理解的良好建议感到困惑。虽然在许多情况下，在许多情况下可能是真实的研究表明，而不是仅仅是无知或不知情，人们经常在冒险时具有良好的知识。越来越多的研究体系提供了关于人们风险的复杂性，动态和矛盾的知识。然而，几乎没有尝试过系统的知识体系。本文有助于这样的企业。它建议区分不同的风险动机，不同的控制水平和许多方式对风险的反射性植根于社会领域。它还探讨了风险程度是发展和保护有价值的身份的一部分。这些文章的结论是，在不同的域名，有良好的证据表明结构和文化力量如何结合和塑造风险，而人们承担风险造就有价值的身份并保护它。推进专家对风险的理解，改变人们的风险需要考虑和接近日常生活中的更大的社会环境和个人风险实践。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of risk research》 |2019年第2期|1-15|共15页
  • 作者

    Zinn Jens O.;

  • 作者单位

    Univ Melbourne Sch Social & Polit Sci Parkville Vic Australia|Mid Sweden Univ Risk & Crisis Res Ctr Ostersund Sweden;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Risk-taking; identity; theory;

    机译：风险;身份;理论;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号