• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of risk research >How do Swedish Government agencies define risk?
【24h】

How do Swedish Government agencies define risk?

机译：瑞典政府机构如何定义风险？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study is guided by two research questions: first, how is the word risk defined by Swedish Government agencies and, second, do these agencies use the word risk consistently with how it is defined? These questions are answered by first selecting relevant agencies and then systematically searching for definitions of risk on these agencies' websites. The study demonstrates that risk is defined in 14 ways, many of which vaguely express the idea that risk is the probability of an unwanted event multiplied by some measure of its consequences. The study also demonstrates that agencies often define risk in ways that are inconsistent with how they use the term (i.e. over and above how it is defined). The findings are discussed in light of normative desiderata for effective risk communication and risk management. The paper concludes with six recommendations for improving definitions of risk used by public agencies.
机译：本研究由两项研究问题为指导：首先，瑞典政府机构定义的字风险如何以及第二个，这些机构如何始终使用它的定义方式：首先选择相关机构并系统地搜索这些代理商网站的风险定义来回答这些问题。该研究表明，风险是以14种方式定义的，其中许多含糊不清楚风险是不需要的事件的概率乘以其后果的概率。该研究还展示了机构通常以与他们如何使用该术语的方式定义风险（即，通过其定义的方式）不一致。根据规范性探索和风险管理，根据规范性探索和风险管理讨论了调查结果。本文缔结了六项建议，以改善公共机构使用的风险定义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号