• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Scholarly Publishing >The Future of Scholarly Journal Publishing among Social Science and Humanities Associations
【24h】

The Future of Scholarly Journal Publishing among Social Science and Humanities Associations

机译：社会科学与人文协会之间学术期刊出版的未来

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The study described in this report grew from recommendations for an investigation into journal economics by the National Humanities Alliance Task Force on Open Access and Scholarly Communications. Since experiments are underway to understand and enable a range of options for a shift to an open access (OA) business model for publishing some scientific, technical, and medical (STM) journals, the question arises, Do these same options exist for a similar shift within humanities and social science (HSS) journals? Findings are reported from detailed analyses of the publishing economics, including all revenues and all costs, of eight flagship US journals across a number of different HSS disciplines. Using actual business information from their association publishers for each of the years 2005, 2006, and 2007, these findings clarify that for this sample of journals, an OA business model based only on revenue from the research article author or producer would not be sufficient to sustain these journals. The research articles published in these journals were longer than typical STM journal articles, and the percentage of non-article content (e.g., book reviews and other scholarly content) was greater. Information-gathering tools and methodologies that enable like-for-like comparison of journal revenues and costs were developed and are described in the report. As an initial in-depth business review of a sample of HSS journals, the report further clarifies some of the key differences between STM and HSS journals, articulates recent journal performance, makes tentative conclusions based on this sample, and proposes further questions that need to be answered to support a shift to OA business models that are sustainable across HSS journal publishing.
机译：本报告中描述的研究源自国家人文联盟开放获取和学术传播工作组对期刊经济学进行调查的建议。由于正在进行实验以了解并启用多种选择，以转换为开放式访问（OA）商业模型，以发布一些科学，技术和医学（STM）期刊，因此出现了问题，对于类似的期刊，是否存在这些相同的选择？人文和社会科学（HSS）期刊的变化？通过对包括8种不同HSS学科的8种美国旗舰期刊的出版经济学（包括所有收入和所有成本）进行的详细分析报告了发现结果。使用这些发现，使用其协会出版商在2005年，2006年和2007年中每年的实际业务信息，这些事实表明，对于这种期刊样本，仅基于研究文章作者或生产者的收入的OA业务模型不足以实现维持这些期刊。这些期刊上发表的研究文章比典型的STM期刊文章更长，并且非文章内容（例如书评和其他学术内容）的百分比更大。开发了能够对期刊的收入和成本进行类似比较的信息收集工具和方法，并在报告中进行了描述。作为对HSS期刊样本的初步深入业务回顾，该报告进一步阐明了STM和HSS期刊之间的一些关键差异，阐明了近期期刊的表现，基于该样本做出了初步结论，并提出了需要解决的其他问题回答以支持向OA业务模式的转变，这种业务模式在HSS期刊出版中是可持续的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号