...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law >Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53
【24h】

Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53

机译：琼斯诉科诺特[2011] UKSC 53

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper examines the Supreme Court decision in Jones v Kernott and its subsequent impact on Trust Law and beneficial interests in the family home. It considers the extent to which a dual regime currently exists between sole and joint legal owners, particularly in the context of cohabiting couples, and examines the extent to which the courts are now able to impute an intention in common intent constructive trusts.View full textDownload full textKeywordscohabitation, joint ownership, family home, constructive trusts, common intentionRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true,"ui_click":true}; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2012.753735
机译：本文研究了最高法院在Jones v Kernott案中的判决及其对《信托法》和家庭住房中的利益的后续影响。它考虑了目前唯一和共同的法律所有人之间存在双重制度的程度，特别是在同居伴侣的情况下，并研究了法院现在能够在共同意图的建设性信托中推定意图的程度。查看全文下载全文关键字关键字居住，共同所有权，家庭住所，建设性信托，共同意图相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，servicescompact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布号：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”}; var addthis_config = {“ data_track_addressbar”：true，“ ui_click”：true};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2012.753735

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号