• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of socio-economics >Contingent valuation controversies: Philosophic debates about economic theory
【24h】

Contingent valuation controversies: Philosophic debates about economic theory

机译：或有估值争议：关于经济理论的哲学辩论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Contingent valuation (CV) is a survey-based method designed for the valuation of public goods primarily developed by neo-classical economists. CV is controversial because it involves asking individuals directly about monetary valuation. Especially this is controversial for valuation of the mere existence of an amenity. From an evaluation of several CV controversies it is concluded that these primarily reflect an underlying debate about economic theory. Some economists, leaning towards a positivist view on science, conclude that CV is beyond the economics research programme. Even some critics of neo-classical economics dismiss CV on a positivist interpretation of economic theory. It is concluded that CV seems to conform to the theoretical core of economics, given a "non-positivist" interpretation of these axioms and assumptions.
机译：或有评估（CV）是一种基于调查的方法，旨在对主要由新古典经济学家开发的公共物品进行评估。简历之所以引起争议，是因为它涉及直接向个人询问货币价值。尤其是对于仅存在一种便利设施的估值存在争议。通过对若干简历争议的评估，可以得出结论，这些争议主要反映了有关经济理论的基础辩论。一些经济学家倾向于对科学的实证主义观点，认为CV超出了经济学研究计划的范围。即使是一些新古典经济学的批评家也拒绝了对经济理论的实证主义解释的简历。结论是，鉴于对这些公理和假设的“非实证主义”解释，CV似乎符合经济学的理论核心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号