...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research >VALIDITY OF THE RUNNING ANAEROBIC SPRINT TEST FOR ASSESSING ANAEROBIC POWER AND PREDICTING SHORT-DISTANCE PERFORMANCES
【24h】

VALIDITY OF THE RUNNING ANAEROBIC SPRINT TEST FOR ASSESSING ANAEROBIC POWER AND PREDICTING SHORT-DISTANCE PERFORMANCES

机译:正在运行的厌氧菌试验对评估厌氧能力和预测短距离性能的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of the running anaerobic sprint test (RAST) in anaerobic assessment and predicting short-distance performance. Forty members of the armed forces were recruited for this study (age 19.78 ± 1.18 years; body mass 70.34 ± 8.10 kg; height 1.76 ± 0.53 m; body fat 15.30 ± 5.65 %). The RAST test was applied to six 35-meter maximal running performances with a 10-second recovery between each run; the peak power, mean power, and the fatigue index were measured. The study was divided in two stages. The first stage investigated the reliability of the RAST using a test-retest method; the second stage aimed to evaluate the validity of the RAST comparing the results with the Wingate test and running performances of 35, 50, 100, 200, and 400 m. There were not significant differences between test-retest scores in the first stage of the study (p > 0.05) and were found significant correlations between these variables (intraclass correlation coefficient [congruent with]0.88). The RAST had significant correlations with the Wingate test (peak power r = 0.46; mean power r = 0.53; fatigue index r = 0.63) and 35, 50, 100, 200, and 400 m performances scores (p < 0.05). The advantage of using the RAST for measuring anaerobic power is that it allows for the execution of movements more specific to sporting events that use running as the principal style of locomotion, is easily applied and low cost, and due to its simplicity can easily be incorporated into routine training. We concluded that this procedure is reliable and valid, and can be used to measure running anaerobic power and predict short-distance performances. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
机译:这项研究的目的是调查运行厌氧冲刺测试(RAST)在厌氧评估中的可靠性和有效性,并预测短距离性能。招募了40名武装人员参加这项研究(年龄19.78±1.18岁;体重70.34±8.10 kg;身高1.76±0.53 m;身体脂肪15.30±5.65%)。 RAST测试应用于六项35米的最大跑步性能,每次跑步之间有10秒的恢复时间;测量峰值功率,平均功率和疲劳指数。该研究分为两个阶段。第一阶段使用重测方法研究RAST的可靠性。第二阶段旨在评估RAST的有效性,将结果与Wingate测试以及35、50、100、200和400 m的运行性能进行比较。在研究的第一阶段,重测得分之间没有显着差异(p> 0.05),并且发现这些变量之间具有显着的相关性(类内相关系数[等于0.88])。 RAST与Wingate测试具有显着相关性(峰值功率r = 0.46;平均功率r = 0.53;疲劳指数r = 0.63)和35、50、100、200和400 m的性能得分(p <0.05)。使用RAST测量无氧力量的优势在于,它允许执行更特定于运动项目的运动,这些运动使用跑步作为运动的主要方式,易于应用且成本低廉,并且由于其简单性而易于合并进行常规培训。我们得出的结论是,该程序可靠且有效,可用于测量运行中的无氧功率并预测短距离性能。 [出版物摘要]

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research》 |2009年第6期|p.1820-1827|共8页
  • 作者单位

    ALESSANDRO M. ZAGATTO,1,2 WLADIMIR R. BECK,1 AND CLAUDIO A. GOBATTO21 Laboratory of Research in Exercise Physiology, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Brazil;

    and2 Department of Physical Education, Laboratory of Sport Physiology Applied, Sao Paulo State University, Rio Claro, BrazilAddress correspondence to Dr. Claudio A. Gobatto, cgobatto@ pq.cnpq.br.23(6)/1820-1827Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research© 2009 National Strength and Conditioning Association;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号