...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of technology transfer >The formation of Coasean institutions to provide university knowledge for innovation: a case study and econometric evidence for Switzerland
【24h】

The formation of Coasean institutions to provide university knowledge for innovation: a case study and econometric evidence for Switzerland

机译：坐标机构的形成，为大学创新知识提供：瑞士的案例研究和经济学证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

"Coasean" institutions are an alternative institutional form that provides a solution to some market and coordination failures. As such they can weaken considerably the case for public subsidies in a vast range of context. They are "market-based" and an inexpensive way to address the public good issues of R&D. They are, however, a largely overlooked institutional option. Early theoretical notions emphasize the advantages of such an institutional setting, however, broader empirical evidence about their effectiveness is lacking. We apply two different empirical approaches to assess the relationship between "Coasean" institutions and the innovation performance of SMEs. In a case study, we investigateInspire AG, a successful bottom-up, institutional invention in the spirit of a "Coasean" institution. To assess the general validity of this model, we use representative firm-level data to econometrically investigate the relationship between "Coasean" institutions and the sales share of innovative products. "Coasean" institutions are positively related with innovative sales only if the company has a sufficiently large absorptive capacity for external knowledge. This positive moderating effect of "Coasean" institutions for the innovation performance is larger for SMEs. Our empirical findings provide a strong case for policies aimed at encouraging the operation of this type of institution.
机译：“Coasean”机构是一种替代制度形式，为某些市场和协调失败提供了解决方案。因此，在大量背景下，他们可以大大削弱公共补贴的情况。它们是“基于市场”和一个廉价的方式来解决研发的公共问题。然而，它们是一个很大程度上被忽视的机构选择。早期的理论概念强调了这种制度环境的优势，然而，缺乏更广泛的经验证据。我们采用两种不同的实证方法来评估“坐标”机构与中小企业创新绩效之间的关系。在一个案例研究中，我们在“赞同”机构的精神中，我们侦查了金银股份有限公司，成功的自下而上的制度领域。为了评估该模型的一般有效性，我们使用代表性公司级别数据来审查“乘员”机构与创新产品销售份额之间的关系。 “Coasean”机构只有当公司对外部知识有足够大的吸收能力时，才与创新销售呈正相关。对于中小企业来说，这种对“Coasean”制度的积极调节效果更大。我们的实证调查结果为旨在鼓励这种类型的机构运作的政策提供了强有力的案例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号