• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Water Resources Association >CONSTRAINTS TO WATERSHED PLANNING: GROUP STRUCTURE AND PROCESS
【24h】

CONSTRAINTS TO WATERSHED PLANNING: GROUP STRUCTURE AND PROCESS

机译：限制流域规划：团队结构和流程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The roles that agencies and other partners play in collaborative watershed management are not always clearly identified. Key factors contributing to group-level outcomes in watershed groups include both structural and procedural elements. Structural elements include membership systems, project partners, and funding, while procedural elements include leadership, shared vision, and mission development. The current research reports on a case study conducted with a Midwestern watershed group that received Clean Water Act Section 319 funds to undertake a watershed planning process. Data come from focus groups, interviews, public comments, and meeting observation, and were analyzed using grounded theory. Findings of this study indicate that homogenous skill set, discord over group and partner roles, and failed problem identification contributed to the organizational inertia experienced by the watershed group. Implications of this research for groups receiving 319 funds are provided.
机译：机构和其他合作伙伴在协作分水岭管理中所扮演的角色并不总是很清楚。在分水岭组中促成组级结果的关键因素包括结构性和程序性要素。结构性要素包括会员制，项目合作伙伴和资金，而程序性要素包括领导力，共同的愿景和使命发展。当前的研究报告是与一个中西部流域小组进行的案例研究，该小组获得了《清洁水法》第319条的资金，以进行流域规划过程。数据来自焦点小组，访谈，公众意见和会议观察，并使用扎根理论进行了分析。这项研究的结果表明，同质的技能设置，小组和合作伙伴角色的不协调以及问题识别失败，导致了分水岭小组经历的组织惯性。提供了这项研究对接受319笔资金的团体的启示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号