• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Water Resources Association >THE CONTROVERSY OVER NATURAL CHANNEL DESIGN: SUBSTANTIVE EXPLANATIONS AND POTENTIAL AVENUES FOR RESOLUTION
【24h】

THE CONTROVERSY OVER NATURAL CHANNEL DESIGN: SUBSTANTIVE EXPLANATIONS AND POTENTIAL AVENUES FOR RESOLUTION

机译：关于自然通道设计的争议：实质性解释和解决方案的潜在途径

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The controversy over Natural Channel Design (NCD) has perplexed, and sometimes paralyzed, the stream restoration community in the United States for more than a decade. Despite the high level of energy expended by participants on both sides, the content of the discussion has not advanced significantly. The two sides seem to be talking past each other, rather than engaging in constructive conversation. This paper attempts to start that conversation. Based on five years of primarily social science research, this paper explains the key components of the NCD approach, evaluates a number of the most common objections raised by its critics, offers a brief explanation for the widespread use of NCD, and concludes with suggestions about how to bring the controversy to a close.
机译：十多年来，有关自然通道设计（NCD）的争论使美国的河流恢复社区困惑不解，有时甚至瘫痪了。尽管双方参与者都投入了大量精力，但是讨论的内容并没有取得明显进展。双方似乎在互相交谈，而不是进行建设性对话。本文试图开始对话。基于五年来的主要社会科学研究，本文解释了NCD方法的关键组成部分，评估了其批评者提出的许多最常见的反对意见，为NCD的广泛使用提供了简要的解释，并提出了关于NCD的建议。如何结束争议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号