...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Urban Design >Challenging the 'End of Public Space': A Comparative Analysis of Publicness in British and Dutch Urban Spaces
【24h】

Challenging the 'End of Public Space': A Comparative Analysis of Publicness in British and Dutch Urban Spaces

机译:挑战“公共空间的尽头”:英国和荷兰城市空间公共性的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The increasing involvement of the private sector in the design and management of urban public space has prompted some critical scholars to predict the 'end of public space'. This study reassesses the implications of private sector involvement through a comparative analysis of British and Dutch urban spaces, based on a threefold critique of the existing literature on the privatization of public space. The analysis is governed by a new model of pseudo-public space that consists of four dimensions of 'publicness': ownership, management, accessibility and inclusiveness (OMAI). The findings suggest that, while there are significant differences between the British and the Dutch cases, neither context supports the notion of a possible 'end of public space' in any literal sense.
机译:私人部门越来越多地参与城市公共空间的设计和管理,促使一些批评学者预测“公共空间的终结”。这项研究通过对英国和荷兰的城市空间进行比较分析,重新评估了私营部门参与的意义,该分析基于对现有公共空间私有化文献的三方面评论。该分析由一种新的伪公共空间模型控制,该模型由“公共性”四个维度组成:所有权,管理,可访问性和包容性(OMAI)。调查结果表明,尽管英国和荷兰的案件之间存在重大差异,但两种情况都没有从任何字面意义上支持可能的“公共空间尽头”的概念。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Urban Design》 |2013年第3期|429-448|共20页
  • 作者单位

    Centrefor Urban Studies, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;

    Nijmegen School of Management, Radboud University Nijmegen, PO Box 9108, 6500 HK, Nijmegen, The Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号