...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of urban regeneration and renewal >The potential for neighbourhood regeneration in a period of austerity: Changing forms of neighbourhood governance in two cities
【24h】

The potential for neighbourhood regeneration in a period of austerity: Changing forms of neighbourhood governance in two cities

机译：紧缩时期邻里再生的潜力：两个城市的邻里治理形式的变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Localism is an active political strategy, developed in a period of austerity by the UK's Coalition Government as a justification for the restructuring of state-civil society relationships. The deprived neighbourhood has long been a site for service delivery and a scale for intervention and action, giving rise to a variety of forms of neighbourhood governance. Prior international comparative research indicated convergence with the US, given the rise of the self-help conjuncture and the decline of neighbourhood governance as a medium of regeneration. The subsequent shift in the UK model from 'big' to 'small state' localism and deficit-reducing cuts to public expenditure confirm these trends, raising questions about the forms of neighbourhood governance currently being established, the role being played by local and central government, and the implications for neighbourhood regeneration. Two emerging forms of neighbourhood governance are examined in two urban local authorities and compared with prior forms examined in earlier research in the case study sites. The emerging forms differ significantly in their design and purpose, but as both are voluntary and receive no additional funding, better organised and more affluent communities are more likely to pursue their development. While it is still rather early to assess the capacity of these forms to promote neighbourhood regeneration, the potential in a period of austerity appears limited. Reduced funding for local services increases the imperative to self-help, while rights to local voice remain limited and the emerging forms provide little scope to influence (declining) local services and (still centralised) planning decisions, especially in neighbourhoods with regeneration needs that are likely to lack the requisite capacities, particularly stores of linking social capital. Initial conclusions suggest greater polarity and the further containment of deprived neighbourhoods.
机译：地方主义是一项积极的政治策略，由英国联合政府在紧缩时期制定，以作为重组国家与民间社会关系的理由。长期以来，被剥夺的社区一直是提供服务的场所，并且是干预和行动的规模，从而引发了各种形式的社区治理。之前的国际比较研究表明，自助结点的兴起和邻里治理作为一种再生手段的衰落，使美国与美国趋同。英国模式从“大国”向“小国”地方主义的转变以及减少公共开支的赤字削减证实了这些趋势，从而引发了人们对目前正在建立的社区治理形式，地方和中央政府所扮演的角色的质疑，以及邻里再生的意义。在两个城市地方当局中研究了两种新兴的社区治理形式，并将其与案例研究现场的早期研究中的先前形式进行了比较。新出现的形式在设计和目的上有很大不同，但是由于两者都是自愿的，并且没有获得额外的资金，组织更完善，更富裕的社区更有可能追求自己的发展。虽然评估这些形式促进邻里再生的能力还为时过早，但紧缩时期的潜力似乎有限。减少用于本地服务的资金增加了自助的必要性，而获得本地声音的权利仍然有限，并且新兴形式几乎没有影响（下降）本地服务和（仍然集中）规划决策的空间，特别是在具有再生需求的社区可能缺乏必要的能力，特别是缺乏联系社会资本的能力。初步结论表明，对贫困地区的极性更大，收容能力进一步增强。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号